Monaco Grand Prix Review

DC completes his personal Grand Slam


Back to
Reject CENTRALE
Back to
Year 2000 Index

The Monaco Grand Prix was not the most exciting race we've seen this year, but generally it went according to script. The big exception, of course, was the mechanical failure that befell Michael Schumacher, but, let's face it, he was due for one. Though his lead at the top of the World Championship table is not as comfortable as it was before, it's not the time for alarm bells at Maranello just yet.

Qualifying was unusual. Unusual in the sense that it threw the 2000 form guide out the window (unless if you're Minardi), but actually not that unusual for Monte Carlo. It was not as bunched as we've seen this year, but then again hardly anyone ever gets a fully clear lap in which he can show his true potential. It's more about who's got the experience and the guile to pick a path through the traffic. In that sense, it's little wonder that Jean Alesi showed up so well for Prost, qualifying 7th, and why Eddie Irvine and Johnny Herbert in the Jaguars were showing signs of competitiveness.

On the other hand, it's also little wonder that Jenson Button was a nonentity, and Ricardo Zonta, also a Monaco rookie (Mika Salo filled in for him last year while he was injured), a horrific 20th. What was certainly no surprise was Schumacher's pole position, cementing his position (as if it was already cemented well enough already) as the ultimate post-Senna Monaco-maestro. His main rival, though, Mika Hakkinen was an ugly 5th - despite whatever experience and guile he may have, methinks traffic put paid to his weekend then and there.

The big news, without doubt, was Jordan, qualifying 2nd and 4th. Yet was this really a sign that they were on the up? Maybe, and maybe not. Judging by their race performances (and admittedly without having seen the qualifying session on TV), I do wonder if both Jarno Trulli and Heinz-Harald Frentzen were more than a little lucky.

Of course, it took a while before we actually got to witness how the Jordans would go in the race! The first aborted start was excusable; cars stall on the grid and that's that. But the second aborted start was simply a joke. The red lights were on for an incredibly long time, and then the timing system failed. Anywhere else and the organisers would be hauled up before Max and Bernie to explain and face a week of constant speculation that the fixture would be missing from the 2001 championship, but this is Monaco, and like it or not it will stay on the calendar forevermore.

Then the real action was at Loews hairpin. Mika Hakkinen must have been truly cheesed off, after pulling off the time-honoured move on Frentzen just as the red flags came out. Heinz-Harald would have been smart enough not to let it happen again at the third start. But what I really can't believe was the completely avoidable incident after the red flags were out. I know the radios don't work as well at Monaco because of the nature of the track, but surely the teams would have been screaming to Button, Pedro de la Rosa and co that the race was stopped.

The incident between the Williams and the Arrows was a racing incident, but they shouldn't have been racing, full stop. I'm not sure what the rules say exactly, but there seemed to be some confusion over how those drivers involved at Loews were to take the third start. Eventually they started from the pit lane, leaving a bizarrely empty grid. How I would have loved to have been that guy with about four empty spaces right in front of him!

So we finally got under way, and Michael Schumacher could not have asked for anything more, with both McLarens bottled up behind the two Jordans. The silver cars were clearly faster, but it didn't take much for Trulli and Frentzen to keep eventual victor David Coulthard and Hakkinen behind. Indeed, I don't think the Jordans were even the third fastest cars out there. Frentzen seemed to hold up not just Hakkinen, but also Ralf Schumacher's Williams and Jean Alesi's Prost. I'm sorry, but the Jordans just simply aren't up to it this year speed-wise.

So Schumi was left to decimate the field, and most of this race was utterly processional. Worse still, some drivers seemed content to leave it that way. I applaud David Coulthard for continuously pressuring Trulli. I don't think the same could be said, firstly for Rubens Barrichello, and more importantly for Mika Hakkinen. On the ITV commentary, Martin Brundle repeated what has been said before, that when the cards don't fall his way Hakkinen seems to lose interest. He certainly did this race, and it cost him points.

All the action this year was at Ste Devote, accounting for Alexander Wurz, Gaston Mazzacane, Ricardo Zonta, Pedro Diniz, Ralf Schumacher and, eventually, Frentzen as well. Without doubt this is one of the trickiest corners on any track in the F1 year, made even worse this time by the sawdust all over the track at that point. Plus marks for the marshals, who often don't get the credit they deserve at Monaco. Those guys at Ste Devote did their job with utmost professionalism and bravery.

Up front, much of the drama happened at the same time, with Trulli retiring, Hakkinen pitting, and Ralf Schumacher crashing. Here in Australia we saw none of that, because we were in an ad break. At this stage I'd like to bag out Channel Nine's coverage in Australia. I know there's already a web-site devoted to this purpose - F1 Fans vs Channel Nine - but I'm going to add my two-cents worth. We'd had 30 laps of uninterrupted coverage, and ITV weren't throwing to a break at the time. After Aussie viewers returned from the break, all three major events had happened, and we only saw tiny snippets of Hakkinen slowing down, and Trulli pitting.

We never saw Ralf Schumacher's crash, even though Channel Nine had the footage. I know that because they had the gall to show the crash on the news the following evening. They also had the gall to show the drivers running back to the pits together after the second start, complete with Murray Walker's amusing commentary. We never saw that during the coverage.

Anyway, back to the race itself. The next big event was, of course, Michael Schumacher's retirement. One of those things, one of those things, and Schumi had the good grace to acknowledge it as well. Considering his (effectively) mammoth lead, and his 5th Monaco victory in the bag, it must have been a bitter blow. It must have also been a bitter blow to Eddie Jordan when Frentzen stuffed up with only 8 laps to go, whilst running 2nd. A simple driving error, though one wonders why on earth he was pushing when Coulthard was 16 seconds up the road.

I'm happy that Coulthard won the thing. He is showing a new consistency and determination this year, and he's sticking it up to Hakkinen. McLaren is Hakkinen's team, and at times Coulthard doesn't seem all that welcome, but more faultless performances like this one will soon have people at Woking thinking about just who is McLaren's main man this year. As for Hakkinen, the number of weird, temporary, fixable little mechanical problems he continually has bemuses me. Think Brazil last year, or Imola this year.

I've alluded to Ferrari's newfound unreliability in previous reviews, but this is becoming alarming. All of last year, Ferrari suffered three mechanical problems in races (Irvine's engine at Imola, Schumacher's brakes at Silverstone, Salo's brakes at the Nurburgring). In 7 races this year they've equalled that already, and now Schumi's suffering from it too. He's got the speed and the psychological advantage, but Ferrari really needs to learn from McLaren's lesson last year. It's almost as if last year's battle between Hakkinen and Irvine has been reversed, and it's a dog-fight between Schumacher and Coulthard this year. As for Rubens Barrichello, another lucky result after yet another very ordinary drive.

I thought before the race that Williams might struggle, and apart from Ralf's little cameo I think they were struggling overall. I still think, with an engine that's exceeding expectations, a good chassis, and two hard-charging drivers, they're still third best, but clearly consistency is still lacking. On the other hand, Benetton is a team that has been consistent, and is now moving up the field. Giancarlo Fisichella looks capable of racking up more points, while the jury is so hung on Alex Wurz (who had another weekend from hell, what with him stalling on the grid and then crashing out) that the rope's breaking. I think he'll see the year out. Just.

Jordan is in trouble. They started this year with hopes set too high. Jarno Trulli probably doesn't care too much, since he's higher up this year than he was last year in the Prost, but the pressure seems to be telling on the team as a whole, and on Frentzen especially. Last year he hardly made any mistakes. The 'oops' at Ste Devote seemed more like something from his Sauber and Williams days. There's speculation that he may be on the move to Jaguar next year, but I do hope he keeps up his 1999 confidence for the rest of this year.

Due to the attrition, Jaguar scored their first points, through a very unspectacular drive from Eddie Irvine, who for much of the first part of the race was behind Johnny Herbert. At least the team's got the reliability now, but it dearly needs more speed and grip. At least now they have points on the board, and they can relax a bit now. Maybe this is the shot in the arm they needed. I get a feeling Jaguar's finally on the up and up, although Johnny needs a stunning result in the next couple of races to save his skin.

Jean Alesi must feel gutted. Had it not been for his retirement, he would have finished 2nd. Think about that for a moment. And, worse still, he probably won't get another chance like Monaco this year. But a timely reminder that he's still 'got it'. Prost as a team are getting there, but slowly, and the alleged departure of Alan Jenkins may be a help in that it provides better team unity, but may be a hindrance, now that his valuable input is gone.

Mika Salo proved what a Monaco expert he really is. He's now scored points here for Tyrrell in 1996 and 1997, for Arrows in 1998, and now for Sauber in 2000. Sauber started the year promisingly, but, as I expected, they're rather standing still. Grip is a problem, and Pedro Diniz doesn't seem too confident. That tiny sparkle of promise he started to show in the past few seasons is dimming, and fast.

Arrows had a weekend they'd rather forget. A lot of panel-beating required now. All the orange cars had a love affair with the Tabac armco, from Mark Webber's car in the F3000 race, to De la Rosa in the warm-up, and Jos Verstappen in the race. BAR really struggled, and Jacques Villeneuve seems to have still not come to terms with Monaco yet. Minardi were also a touch disappointing. This was a track where their power disadvantage wouldn't be such a problem, but both cars were still stuck at the back.

And so, on to Canada - the past venue for wins by both Schumacher and Hakkinen and a low downforce, higher speed track. It's a chance for Couthard to show that he can continuosly outshine Hakkinen, and a chance for Ferrari to show that they're still dominant. But the more pertinent question in Canada, given recent transport union disputes, may be: will there be a crowd??



F1 Rejects
Back to Reject CENTRALE
Main Page   |    Drivers Index   |   Reject Teams   |   Hall of Shame
Featured Rejects
Reject Statistics
Submit-a-Reject
FAQ / Copyright
Reject CENTRALE
• Latest GP Review
• Other Articles
• Links / Banner
Sign Guestbook
Read Guestbook
Current Poll
Previous Polls
All original content Copyright © 1999-2000 Formula One Rejects.