Australian Grand Prix Review

This incident was all Rubens' fault.


Back to
Reject CENTRALE
Back to
Main Page

From our position beside turn nine, the first we saw of it was on the big screen just opposite. The on-board shot was from a car pointing skywards, and lifting. Then spinning mid-air and clouting the fence hard. Then silence.

For the second time in five races, a tragic shadow has been cast over the F1 community with the death of a marshal, struck by a flying wheel. Before we come to reviewing the rest of the weekend's events, spare a thought for Graham Beveridge's family and friends.


Being at the Albert Park track provided us with a unique perspective which television simply can't offer. There is nothing quite like the ear-piercing scream of an F1 car, let alone the smell of one as it comes flying past. From our grandstand vantage point, at one of the slower corners of the track, you can really get an appreciation of how a car is behaving and how a driver is reacting.

You can also add to that the excellent big screen coverage which was much more comprehensive than the international TV feed.

Friday free practice set the tone for the weekend in more ways than one. The immediate impression was that times had tumbled thanks to the tyre war, and that regulations designed to slow the cars down had had token effect. The Ferraris set the pace, especially with Rubens Barrichello, and looked both fast and balanced. Michael Schumacher's massive double barrel roll towards the end of the session was certainly spectacular, but the car remained incredibly intact.

As expected the McLarens were providing the only sustained challenge despite some reliability scares, but with Jarno Trulli ending the day second fastest there was hope that the Honda-powered teams might give the big two something to think about on Saturday. Nick Heidfeld and Kimi Raikkonen were superb in the Saubers, despite Heidfeld's brake problems, but we went away wondering if both of these youngsters, Raikkonen especially, could deliver come qualifying.

After their blistering testing pace, Prost was nowhere to be seen on Friday, and we expected to see more from Jean Alesi in particular. The Benettons were in trouble in terms of both reliability and pace, and the Asiatech engine in the Arrows sounded awfully clunky on up-change. The three drivers who fought their cars more than anyone else at our corner were the South American trio of Enrique Bernoldi, Luciano Burti and Gaston Mazzacane, and it was no surprise to see Burti later plant his Jaguar into a wall.

As we expected, Juan Pablo Montoya was not matching Ralf Schumacher for pace, and the Colombian undoubtedly turned in earlier and used more of the kerb on the exit from turn nine than anyone else. Peter Windsor said he would be observing Montoya from this corner, and it would be interesting to see what conclusions he drew regarding JPM's driving style.

Even on the Friday it was clear that the Bridgestones had a clear edge over the Michelins, and the only two punctures suffered were both by Michelin runners, namely Jenson Button and Eddie Irvine. And it was fantastic to see the European Minardis, the Australian race fans having adopted the team as their own. Fernando Alonso looked brilliantly settled and controlled for a 19 year old, but it was clear that Tarso Marques was having trouble getting to grips with his virginal chassis.

Saturday morning confirmed the trends, with the times free-falling into the mid 1 minute 27 bracket, quicker than the fastest lap ever at Albert Park, set by Jacques Villeneuve in his Williams in 1997. The big news from the two otherwise fairly uneventful morning sessions was that Ferrari were struggling with reliability as much as McLaren, with Barrichello's engine letting go on the way out of pit lane, and Schumacher stopping after he had set what was, at that stage, the fastest time of the weekend.

We then expected the pole time in qualifying to be in the mid to low 1:27s, so Schumacher's effortless 1:26.892 was astonishing, to say the least. Mika Hakkinen may have run close to that time, and he had set blistering times on the first two sectors when Burti's second accident of the weekend, this one caused by an unconfirmed suspension failure, brought out the red flags. Having said that, Schumacher gained most of his time in the third sector, so whether Hakkinen would have snatched pole is debatable.

Both Hakkinen and David Coulthard had the problem of not having enough laps for two runs after the session was restarted, and in the end seemed to circulate rather aimlessly, Coulthard especially. The Scot ended up only 6th, while Hakkinen was relegated to 3rd with Barrichello taking up the other front row spot, as could have been expected. Heinz-Harald Frentzen in 4th, and Ralf Schumacher as the top Michelin runner in 5th (and the only Michelin user in the top 10), were both excellent efforts.

Heidfeld continued to impress, qualifying 10th, with Raikkonen a solid 13th. Villeneuve just pipped the consistent Olivier Panis in the internal BAR battle, the Frenchman having had the upper hand up till then. Montoya was a little disappointing to be down in 11th, while Alesi's form was not improving much, down in 14th. The Benettons were well and truly floundering, Button and Giancarlo Fisichella stuck in 16th and 17th.

Alonso was nothing short of sensational, putting the untested Minardi with what is essentially a three-year-old engine in 19th, around last year's pole time, and ahead of Mazzacane and Burti. Marques, on the other hand, looked more ragged than a bull in a china shop, and didn't make the 107% qualifying time, but was allowed to start with special dispensation, although one can't quite be sure what the reason for that was. Either way, Paul Stoddart had achieved his dream, and both Minardis were on the grid.

Last year, the Ferraris and McLarens monopolised the first two rows of the grid, with a big gap back to the rest of the field, who were all covered by a tiny margin. This year, it would appear as though Jordan, BAR, Williams and even Sauber have pulled closer to the top two, leaving the rest behind, resulting in a more spread-out grid. As a case in point, there was almost a full second between Raikkonen in 13th, and Alesi in 14th.

Grey skies were an unwelcome change on Sunday morning after two days of perfect weather, and there was even some rain at the start of the warm-up. Ferrari only made a brief appearance, and Coulthard would have been pleased to top the times after what had been a fairly unflattering weekend. It was also good to see Montoya, who had been unspectacular thus far, near the top of the times, while Arrows struggled with reliability as they had done the previous two days.

The first few laps of the race were action-packed, to say the least. The start was one chaotic affair, with Schumacher and Hakkinen getting away well, but Barrichello found himself terribly bogged down. This allowed both cars directly behind him (Frentzen and Coulthard) to draw alongside, and with Ralf coming from 5th spot, at one point all four cars were side-by-side.

But Barrichello, realising that he needed to defend himself, started leaning on Frentzen, who nearly jerked twice into the side of Coulthard, forcing the McLaren to ease off and drop back to 7th behind Trulli, although the Scot would soon be past the Italian. Meanwhile Barrichello let Frentzen and Ralf move up into 3rd and 4th. Then Montoya, renowned for his cold tyre antics, made a hash of things by trying to dive between Trulli and Coulthard, only to end up going across the grass at turn one.

The Colombian then went off-road for a second time at turn three, this time crazily taking the (for once) innocent Irvine off with him, relegating the Jaguar to the back of the field, with the Williams now down in 15th behind Raikkonen (who had made a very conservative start). But then Raikkonen proceeded to pull off a sensational move inside the fast-starting Fisichella at turn five, not a renowned passing spot, pulling Montoya with him.

The start of lap two saw Ralf drop back to 7th, with Barrichello moving up to 4th, Coulthard to 5th, and Trulli remaining in 6th. Barrichello closed quickly on Frentzen, and made a rushed move on lap three right in front of us, clipping the Jordan and sending the irate German spinning into the grass. At the time we thought it was a 50-50 incident, but on closer inspection Rubens was coming from too far back, and the incident was totally his fault.

Lap three saw another hugely controversial incident. When Frentzen spun, Heidfeld was ahead of Panis and Jos Verstappen's Arrows. By the end of the lap, both Panis and Verstappen were past the Sauber. This was BEFORE they reached the localised yellow covering where Bernoldi (who had been looking on edge all weekend) had not surprisingly stuffed the other Arrows into the wall already. After the race, both Olivier and Jos were penalised 25s for passing Heidfeld under yellows, although Panis strongly denies it.

Some have said that Panis and Verstappen passed Heidfeld under the yellow for Bernoldi's incident, but that was clearly not the case. The only possibility, then, was that yellows were out where the marshals were still recovering Mazzacane's Prost, out early with a mechanical problem. Panis claims that the stewards took their decision on Heidfeld's word, and the evidence would suggest that it was a contentious call.

The headline-grabbing incident, though, was on lap five, when Villeneuve slammed into the back of Ralf Schumacher's Williams, got airborne, slammed into the catch-fencing in mid-air, and then rolled as the BAR slid along the wall disintegrating itself. Whether the Williams did slow unexpectedly, or whether the Canadian simply misjudged things is a matter of conjecture, and with investigations continuing, it's unlikely that the real story will emerge for some time. But a few comments can otherwise be made.

It's clear that wheel tethers can only do so much. They worked in Burti's first crash, in Schumacher's accident, and in Bernoldi's prang. But they didn't do their job in Burti's qualifying incident, nor when Villeneuve clouted the fence. Then again, such was the force of these impacts, there's only so much the tethers can do. Besides, the cars are meant to disintegrate on impact to dissipate energy, in order to protect the driver. That Villeneuve walked away with only some bruising and extreme pain was amazing.

Having said that, when bits of debris fly all over the place, there is always the danger of marshals and spectators being hurt, especially at a street circuit like Melbourne. One of my first impressions upon arriving trackside was that the catch-fencing was not all that high, and showers of debris could easily go over them, especially if a car took off as Villeneuve's did. But everyone who serves as a marshal, or attends as a spectator, should be aware of the risks involved.

Some footage shown on news bulletins actually showed the wheel coming through the fence and hitting the poor marshal flush in the chest. Like Monza there are questions as to whether or not the race should have been stopped. Of course, it should have been - medical workers and ambulance drivers on track simply cannot do their best work expediently with 20-odd F1 cars tearing round. There's no reason why a race cannot be stopped even after the safety car has gone out.

Those with longer memories, including BAR boss Craig Pollock, an old Villeneuve family friend, will have been chilled at the thought that it was Jacques who crashed in this way. For it was in similar circumstances that Gilles Villeneuve was killed in 1982, when he clipped the rear wheel of Jochen Mass' March, sending his Ferrari airborne, throwing the great Gilles out of the car. While Jacques, only 11 at the time, has rarely talked about his father, the similarity of the accidents will not be lost on him.

For F1, the sad thing is that everyone has suddenly gone into a safety frenzy once again. While a point could be made about the height of the catch-fencing, suddenly there's the talk of coronial inquiries and even criminal charges. Max Mosley is talking about slowing the cars down. Clay Regazzoni has called for Villeneuve to be "shown the red card" (whatever that means), and for Barrichello to be penalised for his incident with Frentzen.

All due respect to the deceased marshal and the injured spectators, but for crying out loud, this is motor racing, with all its inherent risks. Yes, motor RACING. Jackie Stewart is someone who usually makes sense when it comes to talking safety, and all he's said has to do with track safety. He's said nothing about slowing the cars down, and he has said that neither Ralf nor Jacques were at fault. We can do without knee-jerk reactions à la 1994.

The rest of the race, frankly, was rather anti-climactic. Schumacher ran away from Hakkinen, and even the Finn suffered a nasty crash of his own after a suspension failure. Barrichello got held up by Alonso coming out of the pits (the only blemish against the Spaniard all weekend), and Coulthard took the opportunity to go around the outside of the Ferrari into turn 3. Thereafter Barrichello dropped right off to be 30s behind Schumacher at the end of the race, and that was a very worrying sign.

Coulthard ran Schumacher close at the end, but then again Michael was cruising and merely pacing himself. McLaren have a lot of work to do to get on even terms with Ferrari. Unfortunately the Honda users never challenged during the race, Trulli suffering an engine problem, and Panis never getting close to the leading trio. Frentzen's charge back through the field was respectable, but he never looked like getting past Heidfeld, who was promoted to 4th (and out of reject status in one hit) after Panis' penalty.

Montoya would have finished in the points had he not had a BMW engine failure, but to be honest his race was rather agricultural. Instead, with Panis dropping to 7th, Raikkonen scored a point for 6th in his first race, a remarkable result. However, apart from his pass on Fisichella on the first lap, he had little to contend with that he wouldn't have already faced in testing, so the jury must still be out on him. His pace and consistency is without doubt, that is for sure.

Irvine (thanks to a misfire and late pitstop) and Alesi (disappointingly) were non-entities for the rest of the race, both finishing behind Burti. While Jaguar's average performance was somewhat expected, thus far Prost has flattered only to deceive badly when it really counts. A big performance in Malaysia is required from them. And, mind you, also from Benetton, which at this stage wouldn't be much better than the Minardis. Their weekend was disastrous to say the least, and by the end both Renault engines were carrying V8s around, 13 seconds off the pace.

Not much to say about Arrows, but what a debut performance from Alonso and European Minardi! To finish 12th in their first race was nothing short of sensational, and would have felt like a moral victory. While Marques had a terrible weekend, struggling with chassis problems, there was enough to show that Stoddart's men will put up a very respectable season, and Alonso will have many opportunities to shine. Once again, despite their outmoded engine, it looks like Gustav Brunner has come up with an excellent car.

So the 2001 season has got off to a perfect start for Michael Schumacher and Ferrari in less-than-perfect circumstances. For the first time in a long time, Schumacher and Ferrari has started the season neither behind nor equal with the pace-setters, but in blistering form and leaving the opposition in his dust. For once, McLaren is the team with the catching up to do.



F1 Rejects
Back to Reject CENTRALE
Main Page   |    Drivers Index   |   Reject Teams   |   Hall of Shame
Featured Rejects
Reject Statistics
Submit-a-Reject
FAQ / Copyright
Reject CENTRALE
• Latest GP Review
• Other Articles
• Links / Banner
Sign Guestbook
Read Guestbook
Current Poll
Previous Polls
Please send any corrections, comments or suggestions to
centrale@f1rejects.com
All original content Copyright © 2001 Formula One Rejects.