|
F1 Rejects presents our Annual
F1 Season 2007 Preview
All the drivers, all the teams, all the opinionated babble! |
||
|
| Back to Reject CENTRALE | Back to Main Page |
| McLaren / Mercedes | |
|
|
|
|
In another similarity with 1997, a team that won absolutely nothing the previous year will carry numbers 1 and 2. But, after a sparkling off-season, suddenly critics and rivals alike are declaring McLaren and Ferrari as the teams to beat. Why the abrupt upsurge in competitiveness? Autosport's Mark Hughes puts it down to the Bridgestone tyres suiting cars with a forward weight distribution, which the McLaren has, and the 19,000 rpm limit allowing them smaller radiators and hence better aerodynamics.
Then there are the more human factors. Fernando Alonso seems to have that knack of giving 110%, extracting more than the maximum from the car, and motivating the team as a result. Along with the World Champion has come a host of new sponsors, most notably Vodafone, taken away from Ferrari no less. The car may look similar in design and livery and not as fresh as Ron Dennis promised, but there's every reason why McLaren would be going into 2007 in buoyant and confident mood. We know what Alonso can do. A hat-trick of titles would not surprise, but as the first to do it including a change of teams since Juan Manuel Fangio, it would be a sensational achievement. In a way, Alonso's brilliance takes the pressure off Lewis Hamilton. No one expects him to beat his team-mate; if he matches Fernando or is just a two or three tenths off, his mission will be accomplished. As the rookie in the best position since Montoya in 2001, if luck falls his way his first victory may even come this year. |
|
| Renault | |
|
|
|
|
Flavio Briatore has been astoundingly quiet this season, and possibly with good reason. Although they are double double-World Champions, in losing Fernando Alonso they have lost not just a driver, not just a champion, but a man who motivated the entire team with actions not words. Being based on the successful R25 and R26, the R27 will be, and looks like a good car (aside from the ugliest colour scheme in eons), but it has not particularly shone in testing so far and will need to get used to Bridgestones.
The question is whether there is anyone who can eke out that little bit extra from the car, and make the difference by delivering on demand. For all the talk, there is not one scintilla of evidence to suggest that Giancarlo Fisichella will lift his game and start driving the team forward, although we will be "very 'appy" to be proven wrong. However, more fighting words but underwhelming performances will not help to prolong his career, now into its 12th season, and with Nelson Piquet Jnr waiting in the wings as a test driver. And just as one swallow doesn't make a summer, so one Race of Champions victory over Schumacher and Loeb doesn't make a top F1 driver. Heikki Kovalainen was unable to beat Nico Rosberg in GP2, and with just one Nissan World Series title behind him, he does not have a Next Big Thing aura about him. His recent smash in Bahrain won't have helped his confidence either. A few more wins for Renault wouldn't surprise, but neither would a victory drought, and a championship win would frankly come as a shock. |
|
| Ferrari | |
|
|
|
|
Ferrari head into 2007 having lost more than just one M. Schumacher. Ross Brawn is on sabbatical, Nigel Stepney isn't happy and has been shifted sideways, and in has come some less renowned and, with all due respect, less experienced and possibly less able Italians. Despite their familiarity with Bridgestones, and a development of a chassis that was the best on the grid by the second half of 2006, there can be no doubt that Ferrari has, to some degree, been brought back to the rest of the field.
Still, Maranello's testing form has been solid, whether at Barcelona, Jerez or Sakhir. The intriguing thing is, after years of running a one-car team, how will they cope with a genuine intra-team battle? The pairing of Felipe Massa and Kimi Raikkonen will be one of the most fascinating to watch through the season. Massa has continuity on his side, two strong wins last year to boost his confidence, the bulk of the off-season testing, and clearly he has won the hearts of the team. He may well be a genuine contender. Raikkonen however almost seems to have been disfavoured by the team in testing, he's been slower than Massa, and his coldness/party animal Jekyll and Hyde complex might not endear him to the familial atmosphere of Ferrari. Or maybe he's just waiting for Melbourne, when it really matters, to pull out the big laps and assert himself over Felipe. Ferrari are title favourites by a small margin, especially if their reliability holds - but it was the Japanese-spec engine that blew up at Suzuka costing Schumi the title... |
|
| Honda | |
|
|
|
|
Honda certainly know how to attract attention without winning very much. Their 'Earth car' RA107 has certainly got tongues wagging - partly because they've stolen a march on everyone else in jumping onto the green bandwagon, partly because of the new approach to sponsorship which emphasises association rather than stickers on a car, partly because of the public involvement they're inviting, and partly because of that livery, which tries to plonk a spherical earth onto a very non-spherical F1 car.
For all that, nothing breeds publicity like success, but Honda's testing pace suggests that they will, once again, be holding a watching brief just off the leading few cars. In other words, they will regularly be in the hunt for points and even podiums, but it will take a stroke of luck to bring victory. Heck, Nick Fry is predicting they won't win in Australia! That must be a disappointment, for that's where they were last year. It's rare that a non-winning package at year's start gets transformed into a winning one as time passes. Jenson Button's 2006 was decent enough; in fact, after his Hungary win he was excellent. More of the same will see him maximise Honda's potential, whatever that may be, and possibly notch up another win. But as for Rubens Barrichello, some were impressed by him last year, but we were not. His one lap speed in the Honda is fine, but he needs to find a pace over longer runs that will ensure he doesn't fall back through the pack. If he can do that, the Honda pair could be as evenly matched as they ought to be on paper. |
|
| BMW Sauber | |
|
|
|
|
Could this prove to be the story of 2007? In early off-season testing, BMW struggled to adapt to Bridgestone tyres with last year's car, and at the launch of the F1.07 Robert Kubica was decidedly downbeat about his chances. But although the new car has little to commend it at first glance, it has been seriously quick in testing, especially in longer runs, which has got rivals looking over their shoulders at this unexpected challenger. It has been in the top handful in most sessions, and is obviously a very driveable package.
The potential appears to be there for podiums and even wins, but the question is, can the team bring all its elements together to reach that potential? Gearbox gremlins have the team worried about reliability, for instance. It's one thing to make a car quick, it's another to make it last as well. Does Nick Heidfeld have the killer instinct to win races? You just can't imagine him putting in a sequence of banzai laps in the middle of a race, or pulling off several passing manoeuvres when there's a victory at stake. Kubica showed that he can be composed under pressure when he took that podium at Monza in only his third Grand Prix, but when a win is for the taking the pressure rises exponentially. He is still, after all, quite inexperienced in motor racing terms, let alone F1 terms. And how much will BMW's bizarre plan to run Sebastian Vettel on Fridays, at the expense of track time for their race drivers, dent Heidfeld and Kubica's confidence? Improvement on 5th in the constructors' title is likely, but regular wins are still a way off. |
|
| Toyota | |
|
|
|
|
Toyota is one of the minority of teams who start 2007 with a totally new car rather than a development of 2006 machinery, and it shows. Despite the TF107 looking like an attractive little number with some interesting aerodynamic tweaks, they have been next to anonymous over the off-season. A year's experience on Bridgestones should have helped but appears as though it has not, and the engine, although reliable, by last year no longer enjoyed the horsepower advantage that it had a few years ago.
The team are pledging their first win this year, but they said that last year as well. But where is it going to come from? Jarno Trulli no longer inspires, even in qualifying trim, and Ralf Schumacher is doing nothing to shake off his reputation for being inconsistent and overpaid, and over recent years he's also developed a penchant for getting injured. With Franck Montagny and a few young Japanese drivers as test and development pilots, Toyota seem to have well and truly missed the talent boat. That applies to the technical and backroom staff as well, who are now as faceless as the drivers. The rule-by-committee method lacks direction and leadership. It takes more than just money and working harder to succeed in Formula One, you need the right people in the right places, and Toyota plainly do not have that. As Ferrari, McLaren and BMW up their game, and with Renault still competitive and Honda hungry for wins, even podiums for Toyota look remote, let alone that breakthrough victory. |
|
| Red Bull / Renault | |
|
|
|
|
Oh dear. Has Adrian Newey lost his Midas touch? He was meant to be the saviour who brought Red Bull into contention for points, podiums and wins. He even got the Renault engines he wanted. And now he's designed one of his old McLarens, with a twin keel that's oh-so-2002, combined with elements from other machines like the mirrors off last year's Ferrari. The end result? A car that, so far, has been around two seconds off the pace consistently, and can hardly last a race distance due to a myriad of problems.
They may just be sandbagging, but normally if a team's hiding their true pace, they're being deceptively quick, not the other way around. They say that you can't make a slow, reliable car quick - so how do you make a tardy, unreliable machine both quick and reliable? Both Mark Webber and David Coulthard are straight-shooters, so for both to admit that there is a lot of work to do and that expectations for the start of the season are low is a poor indictment. Even the best like Newey miss the target sometimes. All this comes as very bad news for the team's two drivers. DC is the oldest man in F1 now, and a second nondescript year in a row could spell the end of his career. But it could also mean doom for Webber. He simply can't afford two team switches in a row which, although they were meant to take him forwards, end up taking him sideways or even further back. He'll become an overlooked journeyman as teams search for fresh talent. But, in all honesty, minor points right now would seem to be the maximum goal. |
|
| Williams / Toyota | |
|
|
|
|
Williams come into the season with expectations at an all-time low after their humiliation last year, which, strangely, might come as a relief after the years of BMW pressure and the hoopla surrounding the powerful Cosworth engine this time last year. Although the Toyota engine deal is meant to be a partnership rather than a customer arrangement, Williams have been playing the independents card to perfection, joining Spyker in complaining about customer cars and choosing not to test in Bahrain.
No one is saying much about Williams' chances, and for sure regular podiums are probably out of the question, but Sir Frank and his men ought not be underestimated. Their budget is not high, but the Toyota engine will be reliable if not the most powerful, they have found decent new sponsorship, they have Bridgestone experience, their aero package is aggressive to overcome their downforce deficiencies of previous years, and at a guess they are probably around a second or slightly less off front-running pace. In a condensed midfield they may have the measure of the Red Bull teams, Super Aguri and Spyker, and they have every chance of embarrassing the Toyota works team whilst nibbling at the likes of Renault and Honda. One big question mark, though, will be the driving line-up. Nico Rosberg needs to reignite the spark that we saw in the first quarter of 2006, and while Alexander Wurz will be dependable and fast, he hasn't raced regularly for over six years and he simply won't be able to relearn his racecraft overnight. |
|
| Toro Rosso / Ferrari | |
|
|
|
|
Once again, controversy surrounds Toro Rosso as the season begins. Last year, it was V10 engines and the equivalence formula. This year, it's a customer car row. If they and Red Bull are purchasing the rights to Adrian Newey's design from a separate company (albeit simply another Red Bull company), then building the cars themselves, they fall within the letter but perhaps not the spirit of the regulations on a technicality. Although things may turn ugly in Melbourne, the issue seems to have died down recently.
In the meantime, they can get to work refining Newey's problematic design, but in testing they haven't looked too bad, suggesting that the chassis may suit the Ferrari engine more than the Renault. Vitantonio Liuzzi may surprise this season. Team co-owner Gerhard Berger, also a no-bull (sorry, "no-toro") character, said that at the end of last season the team sat down with its drivers to analyse their strengths and weaknesses, to hopefully iron out the driver errors that had blighted their year. Apparently, Tonio responded very positively, and if he works harder and keeps the STR-2 on the road more often, he could upstage his Red Bull stablemates. On the other hand, Scott Speed did not react as well, was late in being confirmed for 2007 as a punishment, and starts the season on the back foot, although he tested strongly on the last day at Sakhir. Liuzzi on talent should have the edge, although, as with the main Red Bull team, points this season may not be too readily forthcoming. |
|
| Spyker / Ferrari | |
|
|
|
|
Here is the independent team that isn't, for Spyker is, after all, a road car manufacturer, even if a very small one. The Dutch company's entry into F1 has certainly injected some enthusiasm into the moribund Midland, and already the team is building a reputation as a little guy who will take the fight up to others, whether by signing Mike Gascoyne, or by railing against Toro Rosso and Super Aguri for using customer cars, or by pinching Giedo van der Garde as a tester from under Super Aguri's nose.
But as for Spyker's fortunes on the track? They have the smallest budget on the grid (hence 4 paying test drivers), the F8-VII is clearly conservative, Gascoyne came too late and can only refine the car, the Ferrari engines help but in testing they have been a bit off the pace. It is conceivable that they will be only two seconds off the best but still be propping up the rest of the field. Whether or not they can score points will depend on their ability to create opportunities, through strategy and set-up, and to maximise them. Christijan Albers impressed mildly in 2006, but he was flattered by Tiago Monteiro having a poor year. He may have his work cut out keeping new team-mate Adrian Sutil at bay, though. The young German starred in his Friday outings for Midland, and appears to have a good turn of raw speed, even if he also seems to have something of a wild streak. This could be an interesting internal battle as the season progresses, although if they score more than a handful of points it will come as a surprise. |
|
| Super Aguri / Honda | |
|
|
|
|
Whether or not Super Aguri suffer the second-year blues depends on your point of view. From a pure results perspective, they will be sure to improve and probably score their first points if they succeed in using last year's Honda RA106. But last year they won over the ex-Minardi admirers by being the team that could do the most with the least, making steady and resolute progress and avoiding unnecessary obstacles. If you look at it that way, Super Aguri's off-season has not been without its difficulties.
Their bid to use the 2006 Honda could land them in legal hot water come Melbourne. They have already had a fight with Spyker over Giedo van der Garde as test driver. The car has failed the FIA's more stringent crash tests, and their launch has been pushed back and then back further, partly because they haven't sorted out their main sponsor and hence their final colour scheme. Compared to last season, when things were tight but at least the team seemed to be in control, this year a mild panic pervades. The RA106 was a consistent points scorer last year, but development moves quickly and will probably be relegated to fighting for occasional minor points. Takuma Sato revived his career last year, relishing his team leader role amongst so-so team-mates. He faces an altogether different proposition though in Anthony Davidson. The Brit will be desperate to prove himself as a racer in a car he knows well from last year. He is a good chance to get the upper hand and start beating Taku more often than not. |
|
| Conclusion | |
|
This year's field could see the closest spread in the history of the sport, with possibly less than 2.5 seconds covering the field. At this stage, Ferrari look to be on top, and there could be a three-way shoot-out for the title between Massa, Raikkonen and Alonso. McLaren are not far behind, while BMW could be next up as long as reliability matches pace. Renault and Honda will not let those top three teams get away and should not count themselves out of the battle for victories at some stage during the season.
Williams look like sneaking in to collect consistent points, but Toyota might flounder in the midfield cauldron. Of the rest, Super Aguri might have the edge thanks to their ex-Honda machinery, leaving Red Bull and Toro Rosso to work up from their current low baseline, and Spyker to bring up the rear despite having a respectable car. The fact is, with the regulations remaining stable, the field is going to bunch up, mistakes are going to be costly, and it could all make for some exciting pressure motor-racing. REJECTS IN 2007: Back to the top. |
| |||
| Back to Reject CENTRALE | |||
| Main Page | Drivers Index | Reject Teams | Hall of Shame | |||
|
Featured Rejects Reject Statistics Submit-a-Reject FAQ / Copyright |
Reject CENTRALE Latest GP Review Other Articles Links / Banner |
Sign Guestbook Read Guestbook Current Poll Previous Polls |
|
|
|
|||
| All original content Copyright © 1999-2007 Formula One Rejects. | |||