Formula Two

The place for speaking your mind on current goings-on in F1

Formula Two

Postby Henrique » 26 May 2009, 12:15

No F1 this weekend, but we'll see the start of the new Formula Two season. Formula Two is a low-cost version of GP2 and is supposed to give young drivers a chance to join F1.
The cars are designed by Williams and feature Audi engines. The championship features eight events and each event will have two races, with a mandatory pit stop on the second race. The champion will win a test with Williams and all the top three drivers will qualify for a superlicence.
Some notable drivers on the list:

Alex Brundle - Martin Brundle's son.
Armaan Ebrahim - the next Karthikeyan? Force India's big hope?
Henry Surtees - son of the great John Surtees, the only man who was champion in both two wheels and four wheels.
Natacha Gachnang - intends to become the first female driver to reach F1 in nearly two decades. Might be the next Amati, but she's probably closer to F1 than Danica Patrick.

Do you think this series will have some success? How many drivers may reach F1? Will we see more world champions or more rejects coming out of this?

An interesting fact: Formula Two was the highest level of racing Max Mosley reached as a driver, where his best result was an 8th place at Monza, in a non-championship race.
Henrique
 
Posts: 615
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 13:48
Location: Portugal

Re: Formula Two

Postby RejectSteve » 26 May 2009, 18:15

Gachnang is also the cousin of Toro Rosso's Sebastien Buemi. She showed potential in Star Mazda and Spanish F3 but in the funnel to the top, she's been a little disappointing in the F2 tests. Another name worth mention is Jolyon Palmer, Dr. Jonathan's son, who has shown some skill. Dr. Palmer's MotorsportVision venture is running all the cars.

Because this series has FIA backing, though it still hasn't shown up on the FIA Championships website, it will survive for a few years at least. The absolute minimum of budgets will help, but I can't see anybody going straight from F2 to F1. GP2 is still the category you need to pass through to get into grands prix, though lots of budget can help.

Looking at the current F2 field, I can't say wether we have champions or rejects, especially as rejectdom is mostly down to luck these days with superior reliability and the emphasis on any pay driver to have buckets of talent before getting a race seat. I can't help but feel that not all of these drivers are of the level. There are quite a few British drivers are in the field, which is fine since the "F1 sons" seem to be on the pace. However, some of these drivers haven't been convincing in other championships. Its good to see some of these countries have a driver is a higher level series, like Lithuania, but Kazim Vasiliauskas has done very little in Italian Formula Renault 2.0. Andy Soucek has spent years in GP2 with limited success, I don't see this being a step forward for him. He might want to stick with Superleague Formula and start considering LMP entries.
Nissanymania! Friday has never been the same since.

The car in front is a Stefan.
RejectSteve
 
Posts: 891
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 08:32
Location: Aquashicola, Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Formula Two

Postby Fitch » 02 Jun 2009, 02:32

An interesting fact: Formula Two was the highest level of racing Max Mosley reached as a driver, where his best result was an 8th place at Monza, in a non-championship race.


Driving for Frank Williams (Racing Cars) Ltd. no less..............
Rentragmuab Tlosz!!!!!
User avatar
Fitch
 
Posts: 161
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 12:58
Location: Indiana

Re: Formula Two

Postby Faustus » 02 Jun 2009, 03:45

I watched one of the races on Eurosport, I think it was the first one of the two. Not bad at all, but I just can't get excited about another one-make series. Perhaps I should explain, I hate one-make series. I've worked on Formula Renault and GP2 cars and all I could think about was making structural changes to the cars. I've never liked one-make series. Being restricted to set-up changes is irritating and not being allowed to carry out further engineering is incredibly frustrating for an engineer. Now Formula 3000, pre-1996, now that was a racing series! Formula 3 is pretty cool to work on, as well.
Following Formula 1 since 1984.
Avid collector of Formula 1 season guides and reviews.
Collector of reject merchandise.
Faustus
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 06:23
Location: UK

Re: Formula Two

Postby RejectSteve » 02 Jun 2009, 08:14

Faustus wrote:I watched one of the races on Eurosport, I think it was the first one of the two. Not bad at all, but I just can't get excited about another one-make series.
I caught the second race and it was entertaining motorsport, but I'll agree with you that there are far too many one-make series. Formula 2 took it a step further that there are no teams, the championship, run by Dr. Jonathan Palmer's MotorsportVision, operates and engineers all the cars.
RejectSteve wrote:Its good to see some of these countries have a driver is a higher level series, like Lithuania, but Kazim Vasiliauskas has done very little in Italian Formula Renault 2.0.
Well I was wrong about Vasiliauskas, he proved to be one of the quicker drivers though Robert Wickens looks to be the class of the series.
Nissanymania! Friday has never been the same since.

The car in front is a Stefan.
RejectSteve
 
Posts: 891
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 08:32
Location: Aquashicola, Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Formula Two

Postby DonTirri » 02 Jun 2009, 09:10

Faustus wrote:I watched one of the races on Eurosport, I think it was the first one of the two. Not bad at all, but I just can't get excited about another one-make series. Perhaps I should explain, I hate one-make series. I've worked on Formula Renault and GP2 cars and all I could think about was making structural changes to the cars. I've never liked one-make series. Being restricted to set-up changes is irritating and not being allowed to carry out further engineering is incredibly frustrating for an engineer. Now Formula 3000, pre-1996, now that was a racing series! Formula 3 is pretty cool to work on, as well.


I agree with you yet I don't agree with you.

One-make series are just bad, as the top-level series (hi indycar)

but as a feeder series its the most logical thing to do. Because what better way to prove your worth as a driver than beating everyone else without any other advantage than your skill.
I got Pointed Opinions and I ain't afraid to use em!
F1rejects no.1Räikkönen and Vettel fan.
BTW, thats Räikkönen with two K's and two N's. Not Raikonnen (Raikkonen is fine if you have no umlauts though)
User avatar
DonTirri
 
Posts: 1003
Joined: 29 Apr 2009, 08:12
Location: Herttoniemi, Helsinki, Finland, Europe, Earth, Sol System, Milky Way.

Re: Formula Two

Postby Faustus » 02 Jun 2009, 17:35

DonTirri wrote:
Faustus wrote:I watched one of the races on Eurosport, I think it was the first one of the two. Not bad at all, but I just can't get excited about another one-make series. Perhaps I should explain, I hate one-make series. I've worked on Formula Renault and GP2 cars and all I could think about was making structural changes to the cars. I've never liked one-make series. Being restricted to set-up changes is irritating and not being allowed to carry out further engineering is incredibly frustrating for an engineer. Now Formula 3000, pre-1996, now that was a racing series! Formula 3 is pretty cool to work on, as well.


I agree with you yet I don't agree with you.

One-make series are just bad, as the top-level series (hi indycar)

but as a feeder series its the most logical thing to do. Because what better way to prove your worth as a driver than beating everyone else without any other advantage than your skill.


Racing is about much more than just drivers. This series exists SOLELY for the promotion of drivers from lower series to the series above it, whereas some other series exist (or existed) as separate entries. Formula 3000 was it's own championship, that while existing as a staging ground for drivers, also prepared teams, mechanics and engineers for graduation to other series. Same thing with Formula 3.
Following Formula 1 since 1984.
Avid collector of Formula 1 season guides and reviews.
Collector of reject merchandise.
Faustus
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 06:23
Location: UK

Re: Formula Two

Postby Faustus » 02 Jun 2009, 17:44

RejectSteve wrote:
Faustus wrote:I watched one of the races on Eurosport, I think it was the first one of the two. Not bad at all, but I just can't get excited about another one-make series.

RejectSteve wrote:I caught the second race and it was entertaining motorsport, but I'll agree with you that there are far too many one-make series. Formula 2 took it a step further that there are no teams, the championship, run by Dr. Jonathan Palmer's MotorsportVision, operates and engineers all the cars.


The truly staggering and incredible thing is the number of different series that exist between Formula Renault and Formula 1. Absolutely incredible and all of these have half-decent grids and in some cases, full grids of 24-26 cars! All the various national F3 championships, the F3 Euroseries, Renault World Series, GP2, F2, Formula Masters, Superleague, A1GP plus all the other ones that I forgetting right now. If you are a driver with a good budget, the choice is endless. And that doesn't include all the other series in the States and Asia.
The career path for a driver, engineer and mechanic, or team for that matter, is no longer clear in any way. There are so many different ways to reach the top, that it becomes completely incomprehensible or the average viewer.
Loads of different ways to the top, but if this year is anything to go by, none of them particularly viable, as evidenced by the presence of one rookie driver in Formula 1.
Following Formula 1 since 1984.
Avid collector of Formula 1 season guides and reviews.
Collector of reject merchandise.
Faustus
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 06:23
Location: UK

Re: Formula Two

Postby crazydude1992 » 03 Jun 2009, 05:06

Kazim, my country man, might become Lithuanias one and only F1 Reject! :mrgreen:
Artificial intelligence is no match for F1 rejectdom.
crazydude1992
 
Posts: 113
Joined: 18 Apr 2009, 19:13

Re: Formula Two

Postby thehemogoblin » 03 Jun 2009, 06:28

Faustus wrote:
RejectSteve wrote:
Faustus wrote:I watched one of the races on Eurosport, I think it was the first one of the two. Not bad at all, but I just can't get excited about another one-make series.

RejectSteve wrote:I caught the second race and it was entertaining motorsport, but I'll agree with you that there are far too many one-make series. Formula 2 took it a step further that there are no teams, the championship, run by Dr. Jonathan Palmer's MotorsportVision, operates and engineers all the cars.


The truly staggering and incredible thing is the number of different series that exist between Formula Renault and Formula 1. Absolutely incredible and all of these have half-decent grids and in some cases, full grids of 24-26 cars! All the various national F3 championships, the F3 Euroseries, Renault World Series, GP2, F2, Formula Masters, Superleague, A1GP plus all the other ones that I forgetting right now. If you are a driver with a good budget, the choice is endless. And that doesn't include all the other series in the States and Asia.
The career path for a driver, engineer and mechanic, or team for that matter, is no longer clear in any way. There are so many different ways to reach the top, that it becomes completely incomprehensible or the average viewer.
Loads of different ways to the top, but if this year is anything to go by, none of them particularly viable, as evidenced by the presence of one rookie driver in Formula 1.


I beg to differ... there is one clear career path:

Money.
Talented in moderation.

---------------------------------

I have a Twitter. You should follow me.

http://twitter.com/KennyOcker
User avatar
thehemogoblin
Moderator
 
Posts: 3682
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 12:14
Location: The great Pacific Northwest

Re: Formula Two

Postby Henrique » 03 Jun 2009, 06:32

Robert Wickens is a Red Bull Junior and he won the first two races. We may be looking at a next year's Red Bull/STR driver.
Watch out, Bourdais :twisted:
Henrique
 
Posts: 615
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 13:48
Location: Portugal

Re: Formula Two

Postby tristan1117 » 03 Jun 2009, 06:58

Henrique wrote:Robert Wickens is a Red Bull Junior and he won the first two races. We may be looking at a next year's Red Bull/STR driver.
Watch out, Bourdais :twisted:


But he has to change his name to Sebastian first.
Let's Go Mets!
User avatar
tristan1117
 
Posts: 2676
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 06:55
Location: Lost in the supermarket

Re: Formula Two

Postby dr-baker » 03 Jun 2009, 07:53

tristan1117 wrote:
Henrique wrote:Robert Wickens is a Red Bull Junior and he won the first two races. We may be looking at a next year's Red Bull/STR driver.
Watch out, Bourdais :twisted:


But he has to change his name to Sebastian first.


I'm surprised nobody has referred to Vettel's teammate at Sebastien Webber yet...
As hardcore as a peach...

West Cliff Results 2015
F1RM WEC: 1st (drivers)/2nd (teams)
F3RWRS: 3rd (drivers)/3rd (teams)
Whoop whoop.
User avatar
dr-baker
 
Posts: 8275
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 03:30
Location: at my laptop

Re: Formula Two

Postby Faustus » 03 Jun 2009, 14:47

RejectSteve wrote:I caught the second race and it was entertaining motorsport, but I'll agree with you that there are far too many one-make series. Formula 2 took it a step further that there are no teams, the championship, run by Dr. Jonathan Palmer's MotorsportVision, operates and engineers all the cars.
[/quote]

The truly staggering and incredible thing is the number of different series that exist between Formula Renault and Formula 1. Absolutely incredible and all of these have half-decent grids and in some cases, full grids of 24-26 cars! All the various national F3 championships, the F3 Euroseries, Renault World Series, GP2, F2, Formula Masters, Superleague, A1GP plus all the other ones that I forgetting right now. If you are a driver with a good budget, the choice is endless. And that doesn't include all the other series in the States and Asia.
The career path for a driver, engineer and mechanic, or team for that matter, is no longer clear in any way. There are so many different ways to reach the top, that it becomes completely incomprehensible or the average viewer.
Loads of different ways to the top, but if this year is anything to go by, none of them particularly viable, as evidenced by the presence of one rookie driver in Formula 1.[/quote]

I beg to differ... there is one clear career path:

Money.[/quote]

Absolutely right!
Following Formula 1 since 1984.
Avid collector of Formula 1 season guides and reviews.
Collector of reject merchandise.
Faustus
 
Posts: 1423
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 06:23
Location: UK

Re: Formula Two

Postby Fitch » 03 Jun 2009, 15:59

dr-baker wrote:
tristan1117 wrote:
Henrique wrote:Robert Wickens is a Red Bull Junior and he won the first two races. We may be looking at a next year's Red Bull/STR driver.
Watch out, Bourdais :twisted:


But he has to change his name to Sebastian first.


I'm surprised nobody has referred to Vettel's teammate at Sebastien Webber yet...


Thought has crosses my mind of referring to him as such in an E-nail to the guys...but I've not been able to watch the last 2 race so I've had no real reason to e-mail them.........

I do call STR, Sebastien Toro Rosso though
Rentragmuab Tlosz!!!!!
User avatar
Fitch
 
Posts: 161
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 12:58
Location: Indiana

Re: Formula Two

Postby Waris » 08 Jun 2009, 03:47

crazydude1992 wrote:Kazim, my country man, might become Lithuanias one and only F1 Reject! :mrgreen:


I've always wondered how a Lithuanian could get the first name 'Kazim'... :lol:
This is a block of text that can be added to posts you make. There is a 255 character limit.

I THINK EVERYONE SHOULD STOP PUTTING FOOTBALL RELATED STUFF IN THEIR SIG
User avatar
Waris
 
Posts: 1389
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 11:07
Location: Amsterdam, Netherlands


Return to The Paul Stoddart Memorial Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], eurobrun and 9 guests