ADx_Wales wrote:In no way was that the Perizzini's fault, the slower cars, especially the GTe-Am guys, are supposed to stick to the racing line, which the Ferrari driver did.
This is not F1, where the slower cars have to bend over to Vettel on a daily basis*, this is endurance racing, if you have a much quicker car, which Davidson did, you are supposed to make the overtake in the safest way possible, and he didnt, it also doesnt help that the blue flags weren't waving, then maybe Perazini would have been more aware.
Look for the blue flags...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fzw5i14ewXY
...no wait there arent any.
Marino Franchitti, deltawing driver, who wasnt in the car at the time of the #7 toyota hitting his teammate Satoshi Motoyama "i see his spatial awareness hasn't improved from his f1 days"
Nice one Marino![]()
*I'm guessing that still happens now right?
PS: how nice of you to bump the page once Davidson crashed and not when Romain Dumas ripped the front of his R18 off after crashing, WITH HIS BARE HANDS!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wMbhgjR ... detailpage
Toyota's race is now about survival rather than a competitive battle with Audi, Kazuki kinda ruined it.
mario wrote:Although it may perhaps be slightly harsh to put all of the blame on Perazzini, he stated quite clearly that he was fully aware that Davidson was closing up behind him (he stated that he could see Davidson in his mirrors, but decided to turn into the corner anyway because he believed that Davidson was further behind him than he actually was). It isn't so much a question of awareness, given that he knew Davidson was catching him, but more of Perazzini's judgement based on that knowledge.
Clint Bowyer at Richmond wrote:Thank you Juan Pablo (Montoya) for wrecking me, and then winning me the race!
Cynon wrote:In other words; Davidson didn't make sure that Perazzini knew he was coming and made a far too aggressive move.
Also, bathplug off Toyota, get drivers that aren't pieces of shite.
Klon in the Chatroom wrote:Vettel is just straight-up bitch nigga.
AndreaModa wrote:I desperately don't want to see another Audi whitewash, if only for the good of the series. It would be great to get a Toyota on the podium, considering how quickly they've had to put that car and team together.
dinizintheoven wrote:I've got one: "Reject Moments That Actually Never Happened, As Opposed To Those That Did And Which End With 'Oh, Wait!'" by the users of the F1 Rejects forum.
JeremyMcClean wrote:If they had the car livery blue and white (like on their overalls) instead of red and white, it would be a bloody good livery.

Nuppiz wrote:JeremyMcClean wrote:If they had the car livery blue and white (like on their overalls) instead of red and white, it would be a bloody good livery.
Oh yeah.
dinizintheoven wrote:I've got one: "Reject Moments That Actually Never Happened, As Opposed To Those That Did And Which End With 'Oh, Wait!'" by the users of the F1 Rejects forum.
JeremyMcClean wrote:No, no, the same style as their current car but blue instead of red. What year does that car come from?
Nuppiz wrote:JeremyMcClean wrote:No, no, the same style as their current car but blue instead of red. What year does that car come from?
1988.
It just sprung to mind, it's a great car to have in Gran Turismo 4.
JeremyMcClean wrote:So this is what Toyota is into these days? If they had the car livery blue and white (like on their overalls) instead of red and white, it would be a bloody good livery. Oh, and I doubt Toyota will win at all. Just like good 'ol times, right?

F1000X wrote:So I got my father a 46 inch (116 cm) television for father's day; he's gone to bed, and I'm sitting in front of this monstrosity, eyes wide, taking in the awesome that is Le Mans in 1080p. I can't wait to watch F1 on this thing.
Here's a question, if does come down to a straight fight between 2 (or 3) of the Audis in the closing laps, does Ulrich let them have at it?
kostas22 wrote:The lesson of all of this is Toyota need to hire proper endurance drivers. Nic Minassian and Emmanuel Collard are targets that come to mind they should be looking at as replacements for Davidson and KazNak.
mario wrote:kostas22 wrote:The lesson of all of this is Toyota need to hire proper endurance drivers. Nic Minassian and Emmanuel Collard are targets that come to mind they should be looking at as replacements for Davidson and KazNak.
If Toyota enter any other races this year, they might be replacing Davidson for very different reasons - although the initial reports suggested he was OK, the latest reports from hospital say he has two fractured vertebrae, which means that he is going to be out of action for some time.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Mark Beretta wrote:So is it true that you've converted about 200 grand worth of race car parts into about $1500?
Garry Rogers wrote:Well, we actually got $1900 cash, plus GST! This is a legitimate sale!
Cynon wrote:In other words; Davidson didn't make sure that Perazzini knew he was coming and made a far too aggressive move.
Also, bathplug off Toyota, get drivers that aren't pieces of shite.

BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
Wizzie wrote:mario wrote:kostas22 wrote:The lesson of all of this is Toyota need to hire proper endurance drivers. Nic Minassian and Emmanuel Collard are targets that come to mind they should be looking at as replacements for Davidson and KazNak.
If Toyota enter any other races this year, they might be replacing Davidson for very different reasons - although the initial reports suggested he was OK, the latest reports from hospital say he has two fractured vertebrae, which means that he is going to be out of action for some time.
That'll mean he won't be able to meet his Sky commitments then, correct?
dr-baker wrote:Wait, why all the hate against Davidson in this thread? He is amongst my favourite F1 Reject drivers, and he had a ton(ne) of success for Peugeot in sportscars...
dr-baker wrote:And the video embedded in this Autosport video shows why I am not a DeltaWing hater (trying vailliantly to continue) and why KazNak is a plonker.
mario wrote:dr-baker wrote:And the video embedded in this Autosport video shows why I am not a DeltaWing hater (trying vailliantly to continue) and why KazNak is a plonker.
To be fair to Nakajima in one sense, he might have found it hard to see the DeltaWing car because the very low driver seating position, combined with the oversized front fenders and relatively small side windows, means that the side visibility of the closed cockpit LMP1 cars is fairly poor. In the thread on the possibility of seeing F1 style engines in sports cars, there is a pdf from the ACO that shows how limited the side visibility of the prototype cars currently is, and the DeltaWing might well have been outside of Nakajima's vision at the point of impact.
dr-baker wrote:mario wrote:dr-baker wrote:And the video embedded in this Autosport video shows why I am not a DeltaWing hater (trying vailliantly to continue) and why KazNak is a plonker.
To be fair to Nakajima in one sense, he might have found it hard to see the DeltaWing car because the very low driver seating position, combined with the oversized front fenders and relatively small side windows, means that the side visibility of the closed cockpit LMP1 cars is fairly poor. In the thread on the possibility of seeing F1 style engines in sports cars, there is a pdf from the ACO that shows how limited the side visibility of the prototype cars currently is, and the DeltaWing might well have been outside of Nakajima's vision at the point of impact.
Ooops, yeah. Forgot that when I rushed to call Nakajima a plonker. I had read that before, and had 'conveniently' failed to remember that. Thanks for the correction mario.
Return to The Eric van de Poele Memorial Forum