DanielPT wrote:Jordan to steal anything from Jaguar.
You steal Jaguar's suspension. welcome to the game!
DanielPT wrote:Jordan to steal anything from Jaguar.
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
Shadaza wrote:DanielPT wrote:Jordan to steal anything from Jaguar.
You steal Jaguar's suspension. welcome to the game!
DanielPT wrote:Shadaza wrote:DanielPT wrote:Jordan to steal anything from Jaguar.
You steal Jaguar's suspension. welcome to the game!
I also want 10VG new designers, 10E and 10VG Commercials if possible. I want to invest 1Million in 4 stars sponsors and another in 3 stars sponsors.
Can this be done?
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
Shadaza wrote:DanielPT wrote:
I also want 10VG new designers, 10E and 10VG Commercials if possible. I want to invest 1Million in 4 stars sponsors and another in 3 stars sponsors.
Can this be done?
Got the new staff in,
You don't invest money but department time in them.
Sponsors only sponsor 1 team at a time (which was new to all of us at game start!)
Currently the 4 star sponsors are:
Pepsi: Sponsor Williams
Bridgestone:Sponsor Jaguar
Kingfisher:Don't Sponsor anyone, currently Toyota (15%) and Arrows (100%) are trying to get them
Redbull: Sponsor Renault (Minardi are trying to get them also 40%)
West:Don't Sponsor anyone, currently Williams are trying to get them (55%)
and the 3 star Sponsors are:
Dell: No one (Minardi spending 30% of time on them)
European: No one (Minardi spending 30% on them)
HSBC: Sponsor Williams
Petronas: Are intrested in Sponsoring Sauber.
Before I would just place your time on an unused sponsor but as you can see there are no blanks, you will have to compete to get them.

BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
DanielPT wrote:Can you tell me if the what is Jordan's development rate and its focus? I believe its default values, right?
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
Mark Beretta wrote:So is it true that you've converted about 200 grand worth of race car parts into about $1500?
Garry Rogers wrote:Well, we actually got $1900 cash, plus GST! This is a legitimate sale!
kostas22 wrote:Whatever strategy Franchitti used at the last race...do that.
andrew wrote:same as last race
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
East Londoner wrote:Right, put Heidfeld on a three stopper. And would it be possible to put Webber on a one-stopper on lap 32? If not, put him on a two-stopper...
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
Wizzie wrote:He's from a family of used cars salesmen... which might as well be the mafia EurobrunMe wrote:I have no idea why I always think Tony D'Alberto is a mafia member![]()


BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Wizzie wrote:EDIT: And before I forget, Don Rennis would like to call all the other team owners muppets again (Except for Minardi)
dr-baker wrote:Wizzie wrote:EDIT: And before I forget, Don Rennis would like to call all the other team owners muppets again (Except for Minardi)
But is Don Rennis a Man or a Muppet? If he's a Muppet, he's a very manly Muppet. If he's a Man, that makes him a Muppet of a Man.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Wizzie wrote:dr-baker wrote:Wizzie wrote:EDIT: And before I forget, Don Rennis would like to call all the other team owners muppets again (Except for Minardi)
But is Don Rennis a Man or a Muppet? If he's a Muppet, he's a very manly Muppet. If he's a Man, that makes him a Muppet of a Man.
That is the single greatest thing I've ever seen
dr-baker wrote:Wizzie wrote:dr-baker wrote:But is Don Rennis a Man or a Muppet? If he's a Muppet, he's a very manly Muppet. If he's a Man, that makes him a Muppet of a Man.
That is the single greatest thing I've ever seen
But you/Don Rennis started calling people Muppets within days (possibly a week) of me having watched the Muppets movie... No connection? (as in you haven't seen the movie recently yourself?)
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
dr-baker wrote:But is Don Rennis a Man or a Muppet? If he's a Muppet, he's a very manly Muppet. If he's a Man, that makes him a Muppet of a Man.
Wizzie wrote:dr-baker wrote:Wizzie wrote:That is the single greatest thing I've ever seen
But you/Don Rennis started calling people Muppets within days (possibly a week) of me having watched the Muppets movie... No connection? (as in you haven't seen the movie recently yourself?)
The last Muppets movie I saw must have been years ago. Which doesn't explain why I've started describing people as such over the past year or so. But, as Eurobrun said, most of the time they've deserved it anyway
dr-baker wrote:Wizzie wrote:dr-baker wrote:But you/Don Rennis started calling people Muppets within days (possibly a week) of me having watched the Muppets movie... No connection? (as in you haven't seen the movie recently yourself?)
The last Muppets movie I saw must have been years ago. Which doesn't explain why I've started describing people as such over the past year or so. But, as Eurobrun said, most of the time they've deserved it anyway
So why hasn't anybody at Foxdale been referred as Muppets then? Or did that just wash right over my head?
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
kostas22 wrote:If Mr Don Rennis is Sicilian, why is he friendly towards the Camorra-aligned Mr Lindsay?
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
AdrianSutil wrote:If Arrows haven't got a new car at the end on the year, do we race next season with the same car or are we out of the game?
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
East Londoner wrote:Change the balance between new parts and the new car to 35% for parts and 65% for the new car.
Wizzie wrote:AdrianSutil wrote:If Arrows haven't got a new car at the end on the year, do we race next season with the same car or are we out of the game?
You have the same car as last year. What that does to performance is beyond me as I always have the car finished several million races before the end of the season
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Mark Beretta wrote:So is it true that you've converted about 200 grand worth of race car parts into about $1500?
Garry Rogers wrote:Well, we actually got $1900 cash, plus GST! This is a legitimate sale!
Shadaza wrote:Shifted the balance to 50-50 at Williams. Williams easily have the best departments at the moment but it is a huge cost on their finances!
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Wizzie wrote:I'm assuming Williams are running Semi-Automatic gears and they haven't just been sitting at the workshop correct? And Williams will put West in the remaining sponsor slots it has and put 25% focus on each of its four sponsors.
EDIT: May I ask what the cost of the chassis was and what Williams' profit statement for this round would have looked like had we not needed a replacement?
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
the Masked Lapwing wrote:Jaguar will shift 80% focus to developing the new car.
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
Shadaza wrote:Wizzie wrote:I'm assuming Williams are running Semi-Automatic gears and they haven't just been sitting at the workshop correct? And Williams will put West in the remaining sponsor slots it has and put 25% focus on each of its four sponsors.
EDIT: May I ask what the cost of the chassis was and what Williams' profit statement for this round would have looked like had we not needed a replacement?
Yes, by default I am putting all legal driver aids on and leaving illegal driver aids off. Obviously if you want me to change that just ask.
A new chassis costs $250,000. However I am not certain if this includes the car parts or not but financially after Imola you have 1.296 Million through Sponsorship and prize money ( vast majority being sponsorship) and lost $1.917 Million in expenditure, with almost $1 million of that spent on personnel (staff and drivers). Counting all expenditure laid out you would of had 1.6ish Million in expenditure without needing that new chassis. you made a net loss of $621000 this period however, with the new West sponsorship and (hopefully) no more need for chassis expenditure you should be about breaking even and with good race results even making a profit.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Wizzie wrote:
In that case, can you screenshot Williams' profit statement for the last race, this season thus and the pages showing sponsorship contract details, and email them all to me so I can start micromanaging?
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
Return to The "Flat Out, Flat Broke" Memorial Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest