Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Wizzie wrote:Forgive me for my ignorance yet again but why did Roger sell up basically all his tracks over the years?
Of all of CART’s movers and shakers, Penske was the first to move to capitalize on the unavoidable threat that the Hulman-George family posed to the sport. The same year that the Indy Racing League took to the track for the first time at Walt Disney World Speedway (an IMS-owned track), Penske formed an alliance with NASCAR’s France family; selling their International Speedway Corporation a 12% stake in his motorsports holding company, Penske Motorsports, Inc. In 1999, he completed his “merger” with ISC; selling them the rest of his PMI holdings (including race tracks and Goodyear racing tire franchises). In the interim, meaning 1997-1998, Penske entered into several joint ventures with the Frances (e.g. ownership of the Homestead-Miami speedway and a large stake in the Grand Prix Association of Long Beach) and he was instrumental in taking CART public and converting his Champ Car holdings into CART shares.
In 1999, as mentioned, he merged with ISC; becoming its single largest shareholder outside the France family group, with a seat for himself and two others on the ISC board of directors. Almost simultaneously, Penske divested himself of all his CART shares so the reality was that he had a large vested interest in NASCAR affairs but was financially uninvolved with either American open-wheel series (except for his team’s sponsorship; which as we saw went with him wherever he chose to go).
Until he could begin to divest himself of his ISC shareholdings – which required a mandatory waiting period – a considerable part of Penske’s fortune was intimately tied to the fortunes of NASCAR. Historically, the six tracks Penske sold the Frances -- California Speedway (now Auto Club Speedway); Michigan Speedway; North Carolina Speedway (Rockingham); Homestead-Miami Speedway; Pikes Peak International Raceway; and Nazareth Speedway – increasingly underperformed the period when Penske held title to them. In large measure this was because open-wheel races had provided the vital first or second races that the tracks needed for maximum profitability and the war in AOWR was already negatively impacting the popularity and profitability of such races.
The Frances, of course, had other reasons (than profitability) for buying Penske’s tracks; their possession gave them undisputed control of NASCAR. However, the declining profitability of Penske’s former tracks was not welcome (to the Frances) and it could have a profound impact on the sale price of Penske’s ISC shares when the time came that he could sell them. It was obviously in both the Frances and Penske’s self-interest to bring about an end to the war in AOWR so profitable races could return to their tracks. Consequently, Bill France Jr. approached Tony George circa 1999 with promises of his support if George would end the war; and Tony refused. Penske made several surreptitious attempts of his own to broker peace; but George rebuffed them all.
It is my belief that Penske needed to bring an end to the war in AOWR in order to safeguard and increase his ISC/NASCAR holdings and that CART presented the most vulnerable target of the two warring series to him. Penske was intimately knowledgeable about CART’s finances and he knew that a public company was more vulnerable to hostile outside assault than a well-financed privately-held one (see his own corporate structures for examples), so CART was the obvious choice. Additionally, Roger didn’t have similar financial information about Hulman & Co. and had no way to gauge their capability to continue to wage war. Also, Penske had had at least five years to study Tony George and the Hulmans up close and it is more than likely that he had judged them to be insane from a practical financial standpoint.
Consequently, I tend to take Penske at his word and assume that he intended to desert CART at the end of the 2000 season. That would put him right in line to be one of the masterminds of the unprecedented series of “accidents” and the outright sabotage that befell the Champ car series throughout 2001; including what I believe to be an orchestrated press attack on the sport throughout the year from media closely associated with NASCAR. By February 2002, CART was on verge of collapse and only the unexpected combative nature of its new CEO, Chris Pook, and Ford’s 11th-hour decision to make the series its captive motor sport saved it until its 2004 bankruptcy.
Penske was greeted in the IRL with open arms by its Japanese manufacturers but not by its series leadership. He quickly found himself in the almost unheard of position of being Toyota’s official engine rebuilder while simultaneously being the supplier of Honda’s engine (both via Ilmor). By then, Penske had almost no financial exposure to the vagaries of Tony George and his minions and he had the muscle of both Toyota and Honda to protect him and project his influence.
With the coming of Penske to the IRL, his partners in NASCAR quickly moved to dominate the sport; easily muscling Bruton Smith and the other members of the speedway cartel aside to control at one point as much as 60% of the IRL’s venues. However, it became quickly apparent that the fans of AOWR were neither as practical nor cold-blooded as Penske and in the final analysis Tony George’s butchered version of the sport drove away more fans than it attracted; and the League failed to provide Penske and the Frances with the profitable other races that they required. Fortunately for Penske, the demise of CART coincided (or precipitated) a surge in NASCAR’s popularity and Penske was able to sell his ISC shares at top dollar and perpetuate his legend as the schemer who always has a chair when the music stops.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
nome66 wrote:so is the race in Texas two 275s or one long 550?
also, does anyone know if more teams have signed with Lotus?
Clint Bowyer at Richmond wrote:Thank you Juan Pablo (Montoya) for wrecking me, and then winning me the race!
Clint Bowyer at Richmond wrote:Thank you Juan Pablo (Montoya) for wrecking me, and then winning me the race!
Clint Bowyer at Richmond wrote:Thank you Juan Pablo (Montoya) for wrecking me, and then winning me the race!
Cynon wrote:
Hearing Katherine Legge will be back in the IRL. Not sure with who though...
dr-baker wrote:Cynon wrote:
Hearing Katherine Legge will be back in the IRL. Not sure with who though...
Here's hoping!
DanielPT wrote:dr-baker wrote:Cynon wrote:
Hearing Katherine Legge will be back in the IRL. Not sure with who though...
Here's hoping!
Where? I can see no Ho-Pin on the grid...
dr-baker wrote:DanielPT wrote:dr-baker wrote:
Here's hoping!
Where? I can see no Ho-Pin on the grid...
(although he did cross my mind as I was typing that sentence...)
Wizzie wrote:He's from a family of used cars salesmen... which might as well be the mafia EurobrunMe wrote:I have no idea why I always think Tony D'Alberto is a mafia member![]()
deCrasheris wrote:Justin Wilson and Dale Coyne are going to reunite this season.
http://auto-racing.speedtv.com/article/ ... -to-coyne/
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Wizzie wrote:He's from a family of used cars salesmen... which might as well be the mafia EurobrunMe wrote:I have no idea why I always think Tony D'Alberto is a mafia member![]()
eurobrun wrote:I didn't expect that
Clint Bowyer at Richmond wrote:Thank you Juan Pablo (Montoya) for wrecking me, and then winning me the race!
Clint Bowyer at Richmond wrote:Thank you Juan Pablo (Montoya) for wrecking me, and then winning me the race!
dr-baker wrote:Can we change the title of this thread and remove the 2011 part please? It seems clear that we will be continuing well into 2012 with this...
And Katherine Legge's grammer on Twitter really is better than most people's? I personally hate decoding text language so I always try to spell and punctuate properly regardless of message medium... Good for her.
East Londoner wrote:dr-baker wrote:Can we change the title of this thread and remove the 2011 part please? It seems clear that we will be continuing well into 2012 with this...
And Katherine Legge's grammer on Twitter really is better than most people's? I personally hate decoding text language so I always try to spell and punctuate properly regardless of message medium... Good for her.
It's definitely better than yours![]()
![]()
Say it with me, grammar, grammar grammar...
I never use text language or what I term as 'street language'. Occasionally, I'll post ingeniously worded statuses on Facebook with proper grammar/punctuation, just to relieve my news feed slightly of incomprehensible language...
Cynon wrote:Bourdais is back, driving for Dragon Racing, and his teammate is she of the I-Use-Good-Grammar-On-Twitter fame, Katherine Legge. Lotus engines, no car numbers confirmed (guessing #8 and #20).
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.

nome66 wrote:i don't know, looks alright to me. beautiful infact. maybe even the most beautiful of the three factory test cars. certainly more beautiful the Bahar-Benetton we had this past season.
Clint Bowyer at Richmond wrote:Thank you Juan Pablo (Montoya) for wrecking me, and then winning me the race!

CoopsII wrote:
The new cars do look superb, although the 'barn door' comment is pretty accurate.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Wizzie wrote:CoopsII wrote:
The new cars do look superb, although the 'barn door' comment is pretty accurate.
Barn door? That's more like the entire bloody farm
mario wrote:Wizzie wrote:
Barn door? That's more like the entire bloody farm
When you hear about the problems that Dallara have had with the car it's not surprising that they've stuck such a large rear wing on the car. As things stand, the last reports indicated the weight distribution is terrible, with the rear weight bias around 59% (the current car has a 55% rear weight bias) which has resulted in severe handling problems as the rear end of the car is relatively unstable. [Incidentally, Dallara claims that the problem with the car is that the suppliers provided overweight components - although some contend that the chassis is probably a little overweight too - and is currently working pretty hard to find places to put ballast and adjust the weight bias, even though it means that the car will miss the target kerb weight.]
So, what you are seeing is probably an attempt by Dallara to stabilise the rear end by putting an oversized rear wing on the car, which is probably part of the reason why the top speed of the cars is lower than anticipated (with the suggestion that Dallara might push the rule makers to increase the engine power to compensate, although the engine manufacturers are not that happy with the idea because it'd mean that they'd have to pay for additional development to cover what they consider to be Dallara's mistake).
mario wrote:So, what you are seeing is probably an attempt by Dallara to stabilise the rear end by putting an oversized rear wing on the car, which is probably part of the reason why the top speed of the cars is lower than anticipated (with the suggestion that Dallara might push the rule makers to increase the engine power to compensate, although the engine manufacturers are not that happy with the idea because it'd mean that they'd have to pay for additional development to cover what they consider to be Dallara's mistake).
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
dinizintheoven wrote:I've got one: "Reject Moments That Actually Never Happened, As Opposed To Those That Did And Which End With 'Oh, Wait!'" by the users of the F1 Rejects forum.
DanielPT wrote:mario wrote:Wizzie wrote:
Barn door? That's more like the entire bloody farm
When you hear about the problems that Dallara have had with the car it's not surprising that they've stuck such a large rear wing on the car. As things stand, the last reports indicated the weight distribution is terrible, with the rear weight bias around 59% (the current car has a 55% rear weight bias) which has resulted in severe handling problems as the rear end of the car is relatively unstable. [Incidentally, Dallara claims that the problem with the car is that the suppliers provided overweight components - although some contend that the chassis is probably a little overweight too - and is currently working pretty hard to find places to put ballast and adjust the weight bias, even though it means that the car will miss the target kerb weight.]
So, what you are seeing is probably an attempt by Dallara to stabilise the rear end by putting an oversized rear wing on the car, which is probably part of the reason why the top speed of the cars is lower than anticipated (with the suggestion that Dallara might push the rule makers to increase the engine power to compensate, although the engine manufacturers are not that happy with the idea because it'd mean that they'd have to pay for additional development to cover what they consider to be Dallara's mistake).
That is not really strange. We all know how Dallara fare against other constructors in a highly competitive and highly technical environment (Say hello, F110!). Sincerely, this is another shot in the foot both for Dallara and Indycar, which is a shame since it was a good opportunity for Indycar to reassert claims of being a credible alternative to F1...
Wizzie wrote:mario wrote:So, what you are seeing is probably an attempt by Dallara to stabilise the rear end by putting an oversized rear wing on the car, which is probably part of the reason why the top speed of the cars is lower than anticipated (with the suggestion that Dallara might push the rule makers to increase the engine power to compensate, although the engine manufacturers are not that happy with the idea because it'd mean that they'd have to pay for additional development to cover what they consider to be Dallara's mistake).
I'ld be pretty cheesed off too if I had to pay for someone else's mistake.
Clint Bowyer at Richmond wrote:Thank you Juan Pablo (Montoya) for wrecking me, and then winning me the race!
Jeroen Krautmeir wrote:The things I posted contained much of the information mario has supplied, but I'm not mario.
The Lotus DW12 doesn't look bad, in fact, I'm not entirely sure if it's me saying this, but it masks the pure ugliness of the chassis itself.
thehemogoblin, on giving a reason for reporting a particular post wrote:He Zsolted!!!
Return to The Eric van de Poele Memorial Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests