AndreaModa wrote:So it looks like this little saga between Prodrive and BMW is about to come to a close finally, with the German manufacturer seemingly getting cold feet and pulling the plug early on a motorsport programme yet again.
BMW set to terminate Prodrive contract to run the Mini WRC team
Whilst it's not actually confirmed yet, and BMW might not yet pull out still, the writing's on the wall as far as I'm concerned. The question now is, how long will the DTM venture last? It's so infuriating, especially seeing as Sordo is doing great things with a car that still hasn't realised its full potential. I wish BMW grew a spine and started committing itself properly to motorsport.
Myrvold wrote:What!? I thought it was just Skoda that had a works team now. That was partly why Neuville suddently got shipped over til Citroën.
This makes me mad. Really mad. WRC was finally going to return to free-to-air TV and then North One bathplugs it all up?! God damn. I will just pray that enough national TV networks come forward with proposals for Filmworks to show up and produce the shows.Autosport wrote:ITV4 had agreed terms to broadcast the WRC in Britain, but that deal fell apart amid the North One situation.
kostas22 wrote:BREAKING NEWS
I have just received a press release from Mini WRT. The official works team as of Monte Carlo is being demoted to a privateer effort, and instead, to retain their status as manufacturers, Team Portugal (Araujo and Nobre) will be promoted to works status. It's a really odd move and I can't make much sense of it, considering Prodrive will still be building and maintaning all the cars.
DanielPT wrote:kostas22 wrote:BREAKING NEWS
I have just received a press release from Mini WRT. The official works team as of Monte Carlo is being demoted to a privateer effort, and instead, to retain their status as manufacturers, Team Portugal (Araujo and Nobre) will be promoted to works status. It's a really odd move and I can't make much sense of it, considering Prodrive will still be building and maintaning all the cars.
I can't help but to smile at that press release. Araujo is a good competent driver although far from the leading drivers league, who, in turn, are far from the Ogier-Loeb league. Anyway, perhaps there was a bust up with those guys in the previously known official works team..
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
DanielPT wrote:Eurosport has a title that reads: "Latvala leads after Loeb crashes".
Never mind that they seem to imply Latvala only leads because Loeb crashed (perhaps they are right, but we will never know).
This is a title that includes all the words that we recently became used to when it comes to rallying, still, put it this way and it brings something new and refreshing to the sport!
Wizzie wrote:It'd only be a matter of time before Latvala throws it into a tree
DanielPT wrote:Eurosport has a title that reads: "Latvala leads after Loeb crashes".
Never mind that they seem to imply Latvala only leads because Loeb crashed (perhaps they are right, but we will never know).
This is a title that includes all the words that we recently became used to when it comes to rallying, still, put it this way and it brings something new and refreshing to the sport!
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Wizzie wrote:There is a God!
Too bad nobody will be able to see it but that might be about to change.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
mario wrote:As usual, it seems that Latvala has been hit by problems yet again whilst in the lead of a rally - he broke his front suspension after striking a large rock in one of the opening stages which has seen him slide quite far down the order.
What is perhaps more worrying is that Latvala's accident, although initially ascribed to chance, might not have been so coincidental after all. Autosport is reporting that stage 9 has been cancelled after reports of spectator security problems - including reports that Neuville had rocks thrown at his car by spectators on the opening stage. If that is not abhorrent enough, there are reports that some spectators are also placing rocks on the roads to try and catch drivers out - so perhaps Latvala's accident was caused by somebody intentionally placing rocks on the course so somebody would crash out. http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/97943
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Wizzie wrote:He's from a family of used cars salesmen... which might as well be the mafia EurobrunMe wrote:I have no idea why I always think Tony D'Alberto is a mafia member![]()
eurobrun wrote:If Latvala went to F1 he would make De Cesaris look like Heidfeld.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Wizzie wrote:eurobrun wrote:If Latvala went to F1 he would make De Cesaris look like Heidfeld.
I think it's safe to say Jari-Matti Latvala is the dictionary definition of a muppet
kostas22 wrote:SS Lazio
Klon wrote:kostas22 wrote:SS Lazio
Are they really called that? If yes, I might become Lazio fan - this hilariously ironic name.
kostas22 wrote:But just to be clear, the SS part stands for Società Sportiva and not Schutzstaffel

MinardiFan95 wrote:In a recent article on Autosport.com, Loeb has shown that he is against endurance rallies, and would quit the WRC if they were re-introduced. I've recently watched the 1991 Safari Rally on TV and from just watching that, I can gather that endurance rallies are much more interesting (at least for TV audiences) then the current short rallies. As we probably all know, one of the main reasons why WRC is so boring now is Loeb's domination, so this could potentially bring more interest from TV viewers (that is, providing there is actually some TV coverage, thanks North One).
kostas22 wrote:MinardiFan95 wrote:In a recent article on Autosport.com, Loeb has shown that he is against endurance rallies, and would quit the WRC if they were re-introduced. I've recently watched the 1991 Safari Rally on TV and from just watching that, I can gather that endurance rallies are much more interesting (at least for TV audiences) then the current short rallies. As we probably all know, one of the main reasons why WRC is so boring now is Loeb's domination, so this could potentially bring more interest from TV viewers (that is, providing there is actually some TV coverage, thanks North One).
Much like the most exciting races in F1 can come from circuits that aren't known as 'drivers tracks' and contain corners the drivers don't like, they often produce good racing. The same applies in WRC enduros, they throw in a random factor that the driver has no control over. A 10 minute lead can become a 20 minute defecit in the space of one stage, the Safari was so unpredictable. If they turned Acropolis into an enduro, that might cause lots of problems for the drivers as well.
DanielPT wrote:kostas22 wrote:MinardiFan95 wrote:In a recent article on <a href="http://Autosport.com">Autosport.com</a>, Loeb has shown that he is against endurance rallies, and would quit the WRC if they were re-introduced. I've recently watched the 1991 Safari Rally on TV and from just watching that, I can gather that endurance rallies are much more interesting (at least for TV audiences) then the current short rallies. As we probably all know, one of the main reasons why WRC is so boring now is Loeb's domination, so this could potentially bring more interest from TV viewers (that is, providing there is actually some TV coverage, thanks North One).
Much like the most exciting races in F1 can come from circuits that aren't known as 'drivers tracks' and contain corners the drivers don't like, they often produce good racing. The same applies in WRC enduros, they throw in a random factor that the driver has no control over. A 10 minute lead can become a 20 minute defecit in the space of one stage, the Safari was so unpredictable. If they turned Acropolis into an enduro, that might cause lots of problems for the drivers as well.
I would also like the return of night stages please...
Wizzie wrote:He's from a family of used cars salesmen... which might as well be the mafia EurobrunMe wrote:I have no idea why I always think Tony D'Alberto is a mafia member![]()
Nuppiz wrote:Romain Grosjean - kids of all ages watch this you know, we don't want to see you realizing your fantasies of creating STR-Lotus babies.
Waris wrote:I thought Loeb was already quitting WRC after this year, to focus on sportscars with his Sébastien Loeb Racing team?
mario wrote:Interesting strategic choice going in in the Portuguese Rally, with Ford and Citroen taking diametrically opposed views. With Latvala and Solberg having first choice for the starting order, Latvala chose last place and Solberg went for the penultimate position, reasoning that they could take advantage of the other cars cleaning up the road ahead of them.
Citroen, however, have gone for the reverse strategy, with Hirvonen first and Loeb second on the road - their logic being that, with the possibility that dust clouds thrown up by the drivers ahead could severely reduce visibility, it is safer to start first and take advantage of the better visibility. http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/98438
It's going to be interesting to see whose decision pays off - Latvala has admitted that his strategy may be riskier, but being so far back in to title chase means that he has little to lose and everything to gain.
Nuppiz wrote:Romain Grosjean - kids of all ages watch this you know, we don't want to see you realizing your fantasies of creating STR-Lotus babies.
Return to The Eric van de Poele Memorial Forum
Users browsing this forum: eurobrun, good_Ralf, Wizzie and 3 guests