FMecha wrote:We (Toyota) must thinking of going to either Jaguar or Arrows. But we only want to do deals.
East Londoner wrote:I'll sign Mild Seven to spots A, G, K, N, R and T, and Elf on spots U, V, B, H and C.
BAR would also like to infiltrate McLaren, to take whichever is the best part on their car
Wizzie wrote:kostas22 wrote:Wizzie wrote:Since both Minardi and Williams can run level 5 driver aids thanks to nicking BAR's Engine Management Units, Williams is offering both their semi-automatic gearbox and traction control technologies to Minardi in exchange of $75 000 for the first lever of each and an additional $15 000 for every level after that. We are open to negotiation in terms of prices.
Minardi offers to pay a $50 000 opening fee for the first level of each driver aid, and $12 500 per level after that.
Sounds reasonable to me. It's a deal
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
andrew wrote:can I take over McLaren then?
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
Shadaza wrote:andrew wrote:can I take over McLaren then?
I don't see why not. First thing you should do is probably think about hiring a test driver.
andrew wrote:Shadaza wrote:andrew wrote:can I take over McLaren then?
I don't see why not. First thing you should do is probably think about hiring a test driver.
who can I hire?
andrew wrote:Shadaza wrote:andrew wrote:can I take over McLaren then?
I don't see why not. First thing you should do is probably think about hiring a test driver.
who can I hire?
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
andrew wrote:I will take Coulthard
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
Shadaza wrote:andrew wrote:I will take Coulthard
hmmm ok, you may struggle with your finances a little!
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
andrew wrote:ok then, when is the next race.
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
Shadaza wrote:Well to avoid overcomplication, for now the tyres you use are the ones that the teams begin with by default.
As for the next race, this shall be soon. You may want to read up on sponsors and driver aids, its all in this thread.
I think I might get rid of the security companies and instead have a trading system. This way teams will want to get better parts, but will have to play it tactically so as to not give rivals too much of an advantage also.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Wizzie wrote: And Williams are still waiting for the levels of all their parts to decide their next development project.
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
Shadaza wrote:Ferrari
Engine Power Rank A+
Best at the moment, though Transmission and EMS can be improved.
Engine Acceleration Rank A
Get Semi Automatic Gears!
Aerodynamics Rank C
Rear Wing, Sidepods and Vanes are bad
Chassis Internals A+
Best Chassis.
Minardi
Power A
Engine running too hot and poor transmission underwrites powerful engine. EMS could be upped and better sidepods needed urgently
Acceleration A
Semi Auto Gears about to come and almost best EMS mean promising Acceleration
Aerodynamics E
Amongst the worst out there in all areas
Internals F
Hakkinen has no confidence in it yet, the parts are poor.
kostas22 wrote:If it is possible to buy chassis internal components and sidepods from other teams, Minardi is desperate to do a deal with Ferrari. Come on mate, we're neighbours, be friendly! We have a history together. Forza Italia
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
Shadaza wrote:I think in this big multiplayer game, asking for permission would be a good idea. Not sure how much Williams would like you going to Ferrari though, they seem to have grown quite a rivalry so far.
Wizzie wrote:He's from a family of used cars salesmen... which might as well be the mafia EurobrunMe wrote:I have no idea why I always think Tony D'Alberto is a mafia member![]()
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Mark Beretta wrote:So is it true that you've converted about 200 grand worth of race car parts into about $1500?
Garry Rogers wrote:Well, we actually got $1900 cash, plus GST! This is a legitimate sale!
Wizzie wrote:Williams will start development on side pods immediately and now we'll try to nick BAR's suspension again![]()
And yes, taking out all my frustration on BAR is almost a form of therapy for me (Plus it's funny as hell whenever Kostas and I double-team him)
East Londoner wrote:Wizzie wrote:Williams will start development on side pods immediately and now we'll try to nick BAR's suspension again![]()
And yes, taking out all my frustration on BAR is almost a form of therapy for me (Plus it's funny as hell whenever Kostas and I double-team him)
![]()
Just for that, I'm breaking into Williams...
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Wizzie wrote:East Londoner wrote:Wizzie wrote:Williams will start development on side pods immediately and now we'll try to nick BAR's suspension again![]()
And yes, taking out all my frustration on BAR is almost a form of therapy for me (Plus it's funny as hell whenever Kostas and I double-team him)
![]()
Just for that, I'm breaking into Williams...
This means war my friend
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
East Londoner wrote:Wizzie wrote:Williams will start development on side pods immediately and now we'll try to nick BAR's suspension again![]()
And yes, taking out all my frustration on BAR is almost a form of therapy for me (Plus it's funny as hell whenever Kostas and I double-team him)
![]()
Just for that, I'm breaking into Williams...
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
FMecha wrote:I think we need to develop internal compoments.
By the way, shall we consider 'Unknown' retirements a DSQ?
tristan1117 wrote:Sauber would like to work on the steering system.
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
FMecha wrote:I think we need to develop internal compoments.
By the way, shall we consider 'Unknown' retirements a DSQ?
BlindCaveSalamander wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Am I the only one that thinks Raikkonen/Montoya (McLaren 2005-06) had the potential to be absolutely beast?
Yes, because it had Juan Pablo Montoya.
Shadaza wrote:tristan1117 wrote:Sauber would like to work on the steering system.
you are already focusing 85% of you time on EMS and 15% on suspension. Not really sure how to divide your time with a new steering system...
Return to The "Flat Out, Flat Broke" Memorial Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests