F1Rejects.com

by **dr-baker** » 16 May 2012, 21:10

DanielPT wrote:
eurobrun wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be Perry McCarthy

fixed

Double fixed.

Triple Fixed.

by **This** » 17 May 2012, 07:24

This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be me

If we start to fix, then do it properly!

by **Stramala** » 17 May 2012, 07:33

This wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be This

If we start to fix, then do it properly!

Fixed.

......................oh.

by **dinizintheoven** » 17 May 2012, 21:07

This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be Al Pease

Checkmate.

by **AdrianSutil** » 17 May 2012, 23:23

dinizintheoven wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be Bernard Charles Ecclestone

Checkmate.

I'm sorry. But THAT's Checkmate.

by **dr-baker** » 17 May 2012, 23:47

AdrianSutil wrote:
dinizintheoven wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be Yuji Ide.

Checkmate.

I'm sorry. But THAT's Checkmate.

And I believe that would be game, set and match.

by **DanielPT** » 17 May 2012, 23:52

dr-baker wrote:
AdrianSutil wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be Chanoch Nissany.

I'm sorry. But THAT's Checkmate.

And I believe that would be game, set and match.

by **Stramala** » 18 May 2012, 00:13

dr-baker wrote:
AdrianSutil wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be Sebastien Loeb

I'm sorry. But THAT's Checkmate.

And I believe that would be game, set and match.

I believe you were wrong.

by **dr-baker** » 18 May 2012, 01:52

kostas22 wrote:
AdrianSutil wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be Danica Patrick

I'm sorry. But THAT's Checkmate.

I believe you were wrong.

I am definitely wrong this time.

by **AdrianSutil** » 18 May 2012, 02:29

kostas22 wrote:
AdrianSutil wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify herself will be Milka Duno

I'm sorry. But THAT's Checkmate.

I believe you were wrong.

by **dr-baker** » 18 May 2012, 08:51

AdrianSutil wrote:

You just made me lose the game. :cry:

by **Stramala** » 18 May 2012, 09:25

kostas22 wrote:
AdrianSutil wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify herself will be Abel Balbo

I'm sorry. But THAT's Checkmate.

I believe you were wrong.

Time to get abstract if I'm going to stay in the game...

by **eurobrun** » 18 May 2012, 15:10

kostas22 wrote:
AdrianSutil wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify herself will be Prince Malik

I'm sorry. But THAT's Checkmate.

I believe you were wrong.

Like a Boss.

by **FMecha** » 18 May 2012, 16:56

AdrianSutil wrote:
dinizintheoven wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be HWNSNBM.

Checkmate.

I'm sorry. But THAT's Checkmate.

The ultimate answer.

by **eurobrun** » 18 May 2012, 17:57

AdrianSutil wrote:
dinizintheoven wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be Daniel Melrose

Checkmate.

I'm sorry. But THAT's Checkmate.

The end.

by **DanielPT** » 18 May 2012, 18:37

AdrianSutil wrote:
dinizintheoven wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be Mickey Mouse

Checkmate.

I'm sorry. But THAT's Checkmate.

Or not the end.

by **Stramala** » 18 May 2012, 18:46

AdrianSutil wrote:
dinizintheoven wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be Zapp Brannigan

Checkmate.

I'm sorry. But THAT's Checkmate.

You want to play that game? Fine, lets go...

by **DanielPT** » 18 May 2012, 18:47

AdrianSutil wrote:
dinizintheoven wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be Flash Gordon

Checkmate.

I'm sorry. But THAT's Checkmate.

Just stretching my legs.

by **eurobrun** » 18 May 2012, 18:52

dinizintheoven wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be Giovanni Roda

Checkmate.

by **Stramala** » 18 May 2012, 18:56

dinizintheoven wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be Johnny Claes

Checkmate.

Makes even less sense than the rest!

by **DanielPT** » 18 May 2012, 19:01

dinizintheoven wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be my unborn son

Checkmate.

You think?

by **eurobrun** » 18 May 2012, 19:43

DanielPT wrote:
dinizintheoven wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be Alan Shoe Trader

Checkmate.

You think?

No, I don't think

by **dr-baker** » 18 May 2012, 19:51

DanielPT wrote:
dinizintheoven wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be my unborn son

Checkmate.

You think?

Change that son to mine, and I believe we'll have a winner, considering my luck at that kind of thing...

by **Stramala** » 18 May 2012, 19:54

dr-baker wrote:
dinizintheoven wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be dr-baker's unborn daughter

Checkmate.

Change that son to mine, and I believe we'll have a winner, considering my luck at that kind of thing...

Because even in future sex discrimination will probably still be rife in F1.

by **eurobrun** » 18 May 2012, 20:29

dinizintheoven wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be Hans Heyer

Checkmate.

Nope.

by **DanielPT** » 18 May 2012, 20:35

dr-baker wrote:
dinizintheoven wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be the daughter of my unborn son and dr-baker's unborn daughter

Checkmate.

Change that son to mine, and I believe we'll have a winner, considering my luck at that kind of thing...

Your luck is not much worse than mine.

Hope you have nothing against arranged marriages, though! :lol:

by **dr-baker** » 18 May 2012, 22:43

DanielPT wrote:
dr-baker wrote:
This wrote:the next person to unrejectify himself will be the daughter of my unborn son and dr-baker's unborn daughter

Change that son to mine, and I believe we'll have a winner, considering my luck at that kind of thing...

Your luck is not much worse than mine. Hope you have nothing against arranged marriages, though!

Not entirely. Depends who I am being made to marry. But if it takes the pressure out of having to ask a girl/lady out, I'll give it a go...

by **Stramala** » 18 May 2012, 23:03

This entire thread

by **AndreaModa** » 18 May 2012, 23:12

I'd like to propose a new Law for the forum, that is, Baker's Law.

Baker's Law is the theory that, given enough time, all forum topics will ultimately descend into a discussion of dr-baker's female predicament.

This topic is an excellent example of this. Thoughts?

by **Phoenix** » 18 May 2012, 23:38

As a moderator, I feel obliged to stop this nonsense. But it's good fun, so I won't.

by **Stramala** » 18 May 2012, 23:49

AndreaModa wrote:I'd like to propose a new Law for the forum, that is, Baker's Law.

Baker's Law is the theory that, given enough time, all forum topics will ultimately descend into a discussion of dr-baker's female predicament.

This topic is an excellent example of this. Thoughts?

This needs a wiki article. Pronto.

by **DanielPT** » 19 May 2012, 00:16

kostas22 wrote:
AndreaModa wrote:I'd like to propose a new Law for the forum, that is, Baker's Law.

Baker's Law is the theory that, given enough time, all forum topics will ultimately descend into a discussion of dr-baker's female predicament.

This topic is an excellent example of this. Thoughts?

This needs a wiki article. Pronto.

I concur. Most of the threads are now contaminated with an outbreak of example cases to back-up such theory.

Also, I believe that in 10 years this will make absolutely hilarious reading!

by **dinizintheoven** » 19 May 2012, 00:27

Kapow. Feel free to add your evidence of the use of Baker's Law in any thread on this forum, especially that "VR-01" quote which, annoyingly, I can't find any more. I was sure it was on "Forum Facts"!

Pages on Hughes' Law and HWNSNBM's Law may follow.

DanielPT wrote:Also, I believe that in 10 years this will make absolutely hilarious reading!

Ten years from now, dr-baker may be F1 Rejects' answer to Peter Stringfellow. Who knows...

by **DanielPT** » 19 May 2012, 00:42

dinizintheoven wrote:
DanielPT wrote:Also, I believe that in 10 years this will make absolutely hilarious reading!

Ten years from now, dr-baker may be F1 Rejects' answer to Peter Stringfellow. Who knows...

For some reason I can't imagine that happening! :lol:

Is this the quote you were looking for?

http://www.f1rejects.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4499&p=154281&hilit=VR01#p154281

by **dinizintheoven** » 19 May 2012, 00:49

DanielPT wrote:http://www.f1rejects.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4499&p=154281&hilit=VR01#p154281

Yes. Naughty naughty dr-baker, omitting the hyphen from VR-01 so that my search engine skills were rendered useless. Load the papaya cannon...

by **Row Man Gross-Gene** » 19 May 2012, 01:20

One question dinizintheoven, wasn't dr-baker nominated as the logical husband of an Ecclestone daughter first and then agreed to do what was best for F1? I may be mistaken, someone with a better memory will have to set the record straight.

by **Phoenix** » 19 May 2012, 01:28

Row Man Gross-Gene wrote:One question dinizintheoven, wasn't dr-baker nominated as the logical husband of an Ecclestone daughter first and then agreed to do what was best for F1? I may be mistaken, someone with a better memory will have to set the record straight.

I believe he was, he is, he will always be.

by **pasta_maldonado** » 19 May 2012, 01:31

dr-baker is the second most talked about person on the forums, behind HWNSNBM. And oh, this is a perfect example of Baker's Law. Maybe 2012 will see the unrejectification of dr-baker with women? :lol:

by **DanielPT** » 19 May 2012, 01:44

pasta_maldonado wrote:And oh, this is a perfect example of Baker's Law. Maybe 2012 will see the unrejectification of dr-baker with women?

And this, my friends, is a thread winner! :lol:

by **dr-baker** » 19 May 2012, 02:13

pasta_maldonado wrote:dr-baker is the second most talked about person on the forums, behind HWNSNBM. And oh, this is a perfect example of Baker's Law. Maybe 2012 will see the unrejectification of dr-baker with women?

How the heck did you find out that I am the second most talked about person on the forums?

F1Rejects.com

Who is online