God knows how he managed to keep his seat in the first place, maybe he has pictures of someone in a compromising situation (I don't suppose he has any of Mosley we haven't already had the misfortune of being exposed to, maybe Briatore and/or Bernie
Clint Bowyer at Richmond wrote:Thank you Juan Pablo (Montoya) for wrecking me, and then winning me the race!
Yannick wrote:Renault must stick with Nelsinho throughout the year if they don't want to let another rookie into their car.
Yannick wrote:And why was Sakon Yamamoto only allowed to do straight line testing?
Robbie wrote:I would consider Nelsinho's biggest flaw to be his arrogance. Throughout GP2 in 2006, he in general just seemed to be TRYING to tick me off.
And I must take exception to Cynon; I believe that Piquet is at Renault for the sole purpose of preventing an Alonsoplosion like at McLaren in '07. If Alonso has such a horrendous driver for a teammate(or seat filler, as I prefer to refer to Piquet), he can't complain and can't take Flav's star away again.
KSvt wrote:I hope he lasts the season, because every GP grid needs an overconfident, undercompetent driver for laughs (e.g., Eddie Irvine).
Pedro wrote:Yannick wrote:And why was Sakon Yamamoto only allowed to do straight line testing?
Because his head would fly off in fast corners!
BB01 wrote:Pedro wrote:Yannick wrote:And why was Sakon Yamamoto only allowed to do straight line testing?
Because his head would fly off in fast corners!
I think that every time i hear his name mentioned![]()
I suspect the marketing boost that the son of a former champion gives a team is probably the big reason he held his seat this year. That said, if they are planning to ditch him for a rookie for next year, i see no point in keeping him past about race 12 of the season. They may as well stick their new guy in for a few races to get acclimatised.
thehemogoblin wrote:I don't see why teams won't give someone like Vitantonio Liuzzi a shot here. Honestly, he's shown much more talent than Piquet has, at least in my opinion...
Bort wrote:thehemogoblin wrote:I don't see why teams won't give someone like Vitantonio Liuzzi a shot here. Honestly, he's shown much more talent than Piquet has, at least in my opinion...
Screw Liuzzi. Bring back Frentzen!
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Yannick wrote:Sato is indeed the most likely driver to get into a race seat, in case one becomes available by another driver being dropped by a team. I still wonder why he hasn't been named as RBR and Toro Rosso's official reserve driver. Maybe not to put too much pressure on Buemi and Bourdais?
Q: How are you finding the pressure?
NP: This is not easy to answer. The Melbourne track did not suit me so well, so this race will be a good showcase and test for myself. I want to qualify well, and if possible even ahead of Fernando (Alonso).
Yannick wrote:Sato is indeed the most likely driver to get into a race seat
LukeB wrote:Yannick wrote:Sato is indeed the most likely driver to get into a race seat
Oh god, tell me this isn't a cruel joke!
LukeB wrote:Oh god, tell me this isn't a cruel joke!
Bort wrote:Sato is a great driver, far more deserving of a drive than half the field currently racing.
CarlosFerreira wrote:Are we being slightly silly? It's as exciting as VLADIMIR PUTIN wearing a LIVE BEAR!
BaconLettuceNinja wrote:If there's anything I've learned in this week's competition, it's that I never wish to live in the Shetland Islands. Ever.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
Return to The Paul Stoddart Memorial Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 4 guests