F1Rejects.com

by **coops** » 27 Aug 2010, 19:24

dr-baker wrote:Which daughter are we talking about? Tamara or Petra?

Blimey, dont start getting choosy, the future of F1 is at stake! IMHO, Tamara is prettier but in that picture she has legs like a rugby player while Petra seems better shaped with a face like a bag of spanners.

Why not hold out for both of them?

by **dr-baker** » 27 Aug 2010, 19:25

Apparently, according to my Google search, Tamara (the one with chunkier legs) already has a boyfriend...

by **CarlosFerreira** » 27 Aug 2010, 19:27

dr-baker wrote:Apparently, according to my Google search, Tamara (the one with chunkier legs) already has a boyfriend...

I have to say, at times even I get surprised at the turns these threads take.

by **coops** » 27 Aug 2010, 19:32

dr-baker wrote:Apparently, according to my Google search, Tamara (the one with chunkier legs) already has a boyfriend...

So? Are you going to let some posh nonce steal your woman?! Lets go and put his windows through! If thats a bit harsh we could just shout things through his letterbox and run away.

by **Phoenix** » 28 Aug 2010, 00:18

CarlosFerreira wrote:
dr-baker wrote:Apparently, according to my Google search, Tamara (the one with chunkier legs) already has a boyfriend...

I have to say, at times even I get surprised at the turns these threads take.

But it's about the future of F1...I think

by **eagleash** » 28 Aug 2010, 00:43

Kidnap them both & don't them go till one of them marries someone. We can't afford to be choosy, the future of Formula Rejects is at stake.

by **dr-baker** » 28 Aug 2010, 02:58

coops wrote:
dr-baker wrote:Apparently, according to my Google search, Tamara (the one with chunkier legs) already has a boyfriend...

So? Are you going to let some posh nonce steal your woman?!

Posh nonce? I went to a private boarding school in leafy Surrey, my school played Rugby against Eton (people in my yeargroup played directly against Prince William) and then I went to university in the south-west suburbs of London (I lived around the corner, a few minutes' walk) from where the TV show The Good Life was set. I think I may be a posh nonce myself (despite my current meagre income).

by **coops** » 28 Aug 2010, 03:06

dr-baker wrote:
coops wrote:
dr-baker wrote:Apparently, according to my Google search, Tamara (the one with chunkier legs) already has a boyfriend...

So? Are you going to let some posh nonce steal your woman?!

I think I may be a posh nonce myself.

Then you are perfect marriage material for an Ecclestone-ette. Hop to it, old boy!

by **dr-baker** » 28 Aug 2010, 03:43

coops wrote:Then you are perfect marriage material for an Ecclestone-ette. Hop to it, old boy!

Got any contact details?

by **coops** » 28 Aug 2010, 03:46

dr-baker wrote:
coops wrote:Then you are perfect marriage material for an Ecclestone-ette. Hop to it, old boy!

Got any contact details?

Try tamara&petra@poshtotty.co.uk

by **CarlosFerreira** » 28 Aug 2010, 03:53

dr-baker wrote:
coops wrote:Then you are perfect marriage material for an Ecclestone-ette. Hop to it, old boy!

Got any contact details?

I do. But it's her you wanna marry, not me.

by **Phoenix** » 29 Aug 2010, 08:04

CarlosFerreira wrote:
dr-baker wrote:
coops wrote:Then you are perfect marriage material for an Ecclestone-ette. Hop to it, old boy!

Got any contact details?

I do. But it's her you wanna marry, not me.

So, who you wanna marry here?
(Sorry, I was just continuing the chain of easy jokes.)

by **dr-baker** » 29 Aug 2010, 19:39

Phoenix wrote:So, who you wanna marry here?
(Sorry, I was just continuing the chain of easy jokes.)

Who's female, single and interested?

by **CarlosFerreira** » 29 Aug 2010, 19:58

dr-baker wrote:
Phoenix wrote:So, who you wanna marry here?
(Sorry, I was just continuing the chain of easy jokes.)

Who's female, single and interested?

That's the spirit, straight to the point.

by **DonTirri** » 29 Aug 2010, 20:36

dr-baker wrote:
Phoenix wrote:So, who you wanna marry here?
(Sorry, I was just continuing the chain of easy jokes.)

Who's female, single and interested?

To use an obsolete internet-stereotype the answers are

"nobody, everyone, depends"

Website · by **Wizzie** » 29 Aug 2010, 20:42

DonTirri wrote:
To use an obsolete internet-stereotype the answers are

"nobody, everyone, depends"

If I were you I would run very far away before Waris starts wielding flaming papayas :lol:

by **CarlosFerreira** » 29 Aug 2010, 20:57

DonTirri wrote:
dr-baker wrote:
Phoenix wrote:So, who you wanna marry here?
(Sorry, I was just continuing the chain of easy jokes.)

Who's female, single and interested?

To use an obsolete internet-stereotype the answers are

"nobody, everyone, depends"

Waris, lacanta and remaining girls notwithstanding, the thought of that is slightly cringe-worthy.

by **DonTirri** » 29 Aug 2010, 21:41

CarlosFerreira wrote:
Waris, lacanta and remaining girls notwithstanding, the thought of that is slightly cringe-worthy.

Like I mentioned, it's an obsolete stereotype. Granted, one that persists in the world even today.

by **CarlosFerreira** » 29 Aug 2010, 21:43

DonTirri wrote:
CarlosFerreira wrote:
Waris, lacanta and remaining girls notwithstanding, the thought of that is slightly cringe-worthy.

Like I mentioned, it's an obsolete stereotype. Granted, one that persists in the world even today.

... and probably true...

by **Waris** » 30 Aug 2010, 00:19

CarlosFerreira wrote:
DonTirri wrote:
CarlosFerreira wrote:
Waris, lacanta and remaining girls notwithstanding, the thought of that is slightly cringe-worthy.

Like I mentioned, it's an obsolete stereotype. Granted, one that persists in the world even today.

... and probably true...

Obsolete usually means it doesn't hold true anymore.

by **CarlosFerreira** » 30 Aug 2010, 01:20

Waris wrote:Obsolete usually means it doesn't hold true anymore.

I think I'm going to pass arguing with you on that one.

by **dr-baker** » 30 Aug 2010, 01:22

So no offers then. Didn't think it was going to happen. :cry:

by **eagleash** » 30 Aug 2010, 09:30

CarlosFerreira wrote:
Waris wrote:Obsolete usually means it doesn't hold true anymore.

I think I'm going to pass arguing with you on that one.

I know I've mentioned this exact situation previously; but; once again we have a Portuguese man discussing the use of English with a lady from Amsterdam.

by **CarlosFerreira** » 30 Aug 2010, 17:54

eagleash wrote:I know I've mentioned this exact situation previously; but; once again we have a Portuguese man discussing the use of English with a lady from Amsterdam.

You have; but we're not discussing English around here. I think.

by **eagleash** » 30 Aug 2010, 17:59

A Portuguese man passing up the opportunity to discuss use of English with a lady from Amsterdam.

by **CarlosFerreira** » 30 Aug 2010, 18:01

eagleash wrote:A Portuguese man passing up the opportunity to discuss use of English with a lady from Amsterdam.

Much better, see?

by **Phoenix** » 30 Aug 2010, 21:44

Not relevant, but I'm still the Phoenglish guy, or is my English improved enough to get rid of that monicker?

by **eagleash** » 31 Aug 2010, 00:27

Phoenix wrote:Not relevant, but I'm still the Phoenglish guy, or is my English improved enough to get rid of that monicker?

I'd say you're 99% there.

by **thehemogoblin** » 31 Aug 2010, 13:12

Phoenix wrote:Not relevant, but I'm still the Phoenglish guy, or is my English improved enough to get rid of that monicker?

Given that you misspelled "moniker," I'm not sure.

by **coops** » 31 Aug 2010, 15:44

thehemogoblin wrote:
Phoenix wrote:Not relevant, but I'm still the Phoenglish guy, or is my English improved enough to get rid of that monicker?

Given that you misspelled "moniker," I'm not sure.

I think he meant 'monkey'.

by **thehemogoblin** » 31 Aug 2010, 15:55

coops wrote:
thehemogoblin wrote:
Phoenix wrote:Not relevant, but I'm still the Phoenglish guy, or is my English improved enough to get rid of that monicker?

Given that you misspelled "moniker," I'm not sure.

I think he meant 'monkey'.

My point still stands; the C is superfluous.

by **Phoenix** » 01 Sep 2010, 00:58

No worries; I'm willing to learn, and whenever I make I mistake, I'd be very glad if someone pointed it out, just like that

PS: No, I didn't want to say monkey, but maybe this word can be still employed in this context.

by **eagleash** » 01 Sep 2010, 07:53

thehemogoblin wrote:
coops wrote:
thehemogoblin wrote:Given that you misspelled "moniker," I'm not sure.

I think he meant 'monkey'.

My point still stands; the C is superfluous.

Just as it is in brik, kik. tik, tok & indeed cok and many more...

by **RAK** » 01 Sep 2010, 08:32

eagleash wrote:
thehemogoblin wrote:
coops wrote:I think he meant 'monkey'.

My point still stands; the C is superfluous.

Just as it is in brik, kik. tik, tok & indeed cok and many more...

Perhaps if you're that appalling singer with the dollar sign in her name.

by **Phoenix** » 01 Sep 2010, 23:47

RAK wrote:
eagleash wrote:
Just as it is in brik, kik. tik, tok & indeed cok and many more...

Perhaps if you're that appalling singer with the dollar sign in her name.

Too $hort?
And for the record...

by **eagleash** » 02 Sep 2010, 01:09

& from the record..

"A moniker (or monicker) is another term for a nickname, pseudonym, or cognomen."

by **eagleash** » 02 Sep 2010, 01:12

RAK wrote:
eagleash wrote:
thehemogoblin wrote:
My point still stands; the C is superfluous.

Just as it is in brik, kik. tik, tok & indeed cok and many more...

Perhaps if you're that appalling singer with the dollar sign in her name.

& also in Rak. :lol:

by **coops** » 02 Sep 2010, 06:05

eagleash wrote:& from the record..
"A moniker (or monicker) is another term for a nickname, pseudonym, or cognomen."

Never mind all that now, are you sticking with your current avatar or are you replacing it with a pic of Ben Collins?

by **eagleash** » 02 Sep 2010, 06:48

coops wrote:
eagleash wrote:& from the record..
"A moniker (or monicker) is another term for a nickname, pseudonym, or cognomen."

Never mind all that now, are you sticking with your current avatar or are you replacing it with a pic of Ben Collins?

That is a pic of Ben Collins.

I did have it mind to change the avatar once the worst kept secret in TV had been revealed today.

Will prob do so.......

by **CarlosFerreira** » 02 Sep 2010, 06:51

eagleash wrote:
coops wrote:
eagleash wrote:& from the record..
"A moniker (or monicker) is another term for a nickname, pseudonym, or cognomen."

Never mind all that now, are you sticking with your current avatar or are you replacing it with a pic of Ben Collins?

That is a pic of Ben Collins.

I did have it mind to change the avatar once the worst kept secret in TV had been revealed today.

Will prob do so.......

You can have my temporary avatar with a certain anonymous Swiss Toro Rosso driver, for added confusion.

F1Rejects.com

Who is online