Klon wrote:Because this thread already has seen an expression of my raving insanity, I'll go ahead again - I currently am thinking that Panis, even after his broken leg(s?) could have been champion or at least a man with more than just one win if he had been more patient. Back in the day Häkkinen was quite angered with losing Olivier Panis as McLaren's test driver. Maybe if Panis would have stayed at McLaren, Mika would have proposed Panis as his successor and just maybe Ron would have listened to him. Assuming Panis' career would have gone as it did (i.e. until the end of 2004) Panis would have a race-winning car in 2002, a championship contending car in 2003 and ... a car in 2004, so that means even in his "weakend" state he could have won races. Well, I guess it's time to activate GPM2 and test it out.
Klon wrote:Because this thread already has seen an expression of my raving insanity, I'll go ahead again - I currently am thinking that Panis, even after his broken leg(s?) could have been champion or at least a man with more than just one win if he had been more patient. Back in the day Häkkinen was quite angered with losing Olivier Panis as McLaren's test driver. Maybe if Panis would have stayed at McLaren, Mika would have proposed Panis as his successor and just maybe Ron would have listened to him. Assuming Panis' career would have gone as it did (i.e. until the end of 2004) Panis would have a race-winning car in 2002, a championship contending car in 2003 and ... a car in 2004, so that means even in his "weakend" state he could have won races. Well, I guess it's time to activate GPM2 and test it out.
thehemogoblin, on giving a reason for reporting a particular post wrote:He Zsolted!!!
F1000X wrote:If Jean Alesi hadn't gone to Ferrari in 1991, would he have been a world champion? Certainly he might have won more races.
fjackdaw wrote:I think the headline:
Green to replace Smith at Force India
should actually read:
Green to replace Orange at Force India
Jeroen Krautmeir wrote:F1000X wrote:If Jean Alesi hadn't gone to Ferrari in 1991, would he have been a world champion? Certainly he might have won more races.
If he had accepted the Williams offer, he probably would have, considering he would have taken the seat that Nigel Mansell eventually got. Oh, what might have been...
ADx_Wales wrote:Jeroen Krautmeir wrote:F1000X wrote:If Jean Alesi hadn't gone to Ferrari in 1991, would he have been a world champion? Certainly he might have won more races.
If he had accepted the Williams offer, he probably would have, considering he would have taken the seat that Nigel Mansell eventually got. Oh, what might have been...
If Modena managed second on the grid in 91, imagine what alesi would have achieved if he had one more year at tyrell with the best enigine of the era.
Warren Hughes wrote:One of the great things about this forum is that I can never remember which conversation is happening in which thread. The title of the thread being no help at all, of course.
ADx_Wales wrote:Jeroen Krautmeir wrote:F1000X wrote:If he had accepted the Williams offer, he probably would have, considering he would have taken the seat that Nigel Mansell eventually got. Oh, what might have been...
If Modena managed second on the grid in 91, imagine what alesi would have achieved if he had one more year at tyrell with the best enigine of the era.
He wouldn't have been significantly better than Modena, to be fair to Stefano, he was the most underrated driver of that era.
ADx_Wales wrote:Jeroen Krautmeir wrote:F1000X wrote:If Jean Alesi hadn't gone to Ferrari in 1991, would he have been a world champion? Certainly he might have won more races.
If he had accepted the Williams offer, he probably would have, considering he would have taken the seat that Nigel Mansell eventually got. Oh, what might have been...
If Modena managed second on the grid in 91, imagine what alesi would have achieved if he had one more year at tyrell with the best enigine of the era.
Warren Hughes wrote:On the BBC's Classic Grand Prix feature, there's footage of the 1985 Dutch GP, also featuring post-race interviews with the top two drivers, Niki Lauda and Alain Prost. During the interview, Prost uses the phrase 'for sure' in its standard F1 context (ie completely wrongly). Looks like it's not just a modern thing. Points to anyone who can find an earlier incidence of 'for sure'-ing from an F1 personality.
ADx_Wales wrote:I know what your thinking, the 1982 San Marino Grand prix is the best of that group...
However:
Only 13 cars started the race due to political wrangling from one division of teams.
Its essentially a Ferrari demonstration run...
...at the nearest Circuit to the Ferrari Factory.
Had this race been anywhere else in the world this would have been an utter shambles, for instance if th 2005 San Marino GP only had the 6 Bridgestone runners who did Indy, none of the fans would have complained...
The outcome of the race lead to one of the greatest drivers of that generation having his morale instantly vanish as if some clever surgeon removed it, and then get killed in a crash not long later trying to prove a point.
HOW is this one of the great races?
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
fjackdaw wrote:I just walked past David Coulthard at Milton Keynes train station. Shouldn't he be in Korea?
David Coulthard wrote:...On the subject of McLaren, I'll be broadcasting from Woking this weekend as part of the BBC TV coverage. A lot of people don't realise how much is going on at the factory during a Grand Prix, and I'll be in the team's operation room, which should make for a good feature. I'l be getting up in the early hours like the rest of you!
ADx_Wales wrote:Warren Hughes wrote:On the BBC's Classic Grand Prix feature, there's footage of the 1985 Dutch GP, also featuring post-race interviews with the top two drivers, Niki Lauda and Alain Prost. During the interview, Prost uses the phrase 'for sure' in its standard F1 context (ie completely wrongly). Looks like it's not just a modern thing. Points to anyone who can find an earlier incidence of 'for sure'-ing from an F1 personality.
I know what your thinking, the 1982 San Marino Grand prix is the best of that group...
However:
Only 13 cars started the race due to political wrangling from one division of teams.
Its essentially a Ferrari demonstration run...
...at the nearest Circuit to the Ferrari Factory.
Had this race been anywhere else in the world this would have been an utter shambles, for instance if th 2005 San Marino GP only had the 6 Bridgestone runners who did Indy, none of the fans would have complained...
The outcome of the race lead to one of the greatest drivers of that generation having his morale instantly vanish as if some clever surgeon removed it, and then get killed in a crash not long later trying to prove a point.
HOW is this one of the great races?
dr-baker wrote:fjackdaw wrote:I just walked past David Coulthard at Milton Keynes train station. Shouldn't he be in Korea?
In this week's Autosport magazine:David Coulthard wrote:...On the subject of McLaren, I'll be broadcasting from Woking this weekend as part of the BBC TV coverage. A lot of people don't realise how much is going on at the factory during a Grand Prix, and I'll be in the team's operation room, which should make for a good feature. I'l be getting up in the early hours like the rest of you!
Which doesn't explain why he's in MK, home of RBR, instead of Surrey, McLaren's home.
ADx_Wales wrote:DC is GMT-based because he will be at McLaren's "Mission Control" for the duration of the BBC Broadcast.
Clint Bowyer at Richmond wrote:Thank you Juan Pablo (Montoya) for wrecking me, and then winning me the race!
Warren Hughes wrote:Cynon's new avatar freaks me out.
dr-baker wrote:ADx_Wales wrote:DC is GMT-based because he will be at McLaren's "Mission Control" for the duration of the BBC Broadcast.
Sorry, but I have to say this: Duh! Context of that was clear in the original article, and the fact he was seen in MK!
ADx_Wales wrote:dr-baker wrote:ADx_Wales wrote:DC is GMT-based because he will be at McLaren's "Mission Control" for the duration of the BBC Broadcast.
Sorry, but I have to say this: Duh! Context of that was clear in the original article, and the fact he was seen in MK!
Well excuse me for not being able to read for a fraction of a second.
ADx_Wales wrote:If only Felipe had my skill of not paying attention...
midgrid wrote:The Korean circuit is the reincarnation of Aida. The track layout is similar (albeit about 50% longer): a couple of long straights, some fast esses and a some fiddly technical sessions, and the circuit itself seems very remote, isolated and lacking in infrastructure, and is also surrounded by hills.
Klon wrote:midgrid wrote:The Korean circuit is the reincarnation of Aida. The track layout is similar (albeit about 50% longer): a couple of long straights, some fast esses and a some fiddly technical sessions, and the circuit itself seems very remote, isolated and lacking in infrastructure, and is also surrounded by hills.
I knew, I knew, that the whole scenery reminded me of something but I could not point out what is was. Thank you, midgrid, my brain can rest for now.
Martin Brundle, at the 2005 San Marino GP wrote:You can sort of imagine in four or five years time talking about these guys we've got on the front two rows of the grid today, can't you? They're very much the future of Grand Prix Racing.
MinardiFan95 wrote:Anyone who I pick to win in Predicamant Predictions usually retires from the race.
thehemogoblin wrote:Phoenix wrote:Showed this forum to a friend that actually cares about F1, hasn't registered so far despite saying he liked it. What have I done wrong?
We're weird.
Return to The Paul Stoddart Memorial Forum
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 2 guests